MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2886367028 · doi:10.1097/ncm.0000000000000312

National Case Management Week 2018

2018· article· en· W2886367028 sur OpenAlexaff
Kathleen Fraser

Notice bibliographique

RevueProfessional Case Management · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueClinical practice guidelines implementation
Établissements canadiensFraser Health
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCase managementBusinessAutonomyManaged careNursingPublic relationsMedicineOperations managementHealth carePolitical scienceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In October 2018, the Case Management Society of America (CMSA) and the greater case management community celebrates National Case Management Week, a time to honor and recognize all professional case managers across the continuum of care in the United States. Case management has been practiced in the United States for over half of a century, and through that period we have assisted our patients and our clients in developing their plans to “move to wellness.”This year's National Case Management Week logo reflects that movement; just as the CMSA's Standards of Practice for Case Management prescribe, we assess, plan, collaborate, implement, monitor, and evaluate our patients and clients to achieve improved outcomes. True professional case management requires a patient or client-centered approach, with influencers assisting along the way. If someone asked you “what you do” in more detail, what would you say? What is the true value of a case manager from the perspective of the patient or family caregiver? Although we know our value, here are some facts to ponder about our very significant work. Case Management Services Case management serves as a means for achieving client wellness and autonomy through advocacy, communication, education, identification of service resources, and service facilitation. The case manager helps identify appropriate providers and facilities throughout the continuum of services, while utilizing available resources timely and cost-effectively to obtain optimum value for both the patient and the reimbursement source. Coordination of care, managing multidisciplinary teams, and achieving better transitions of care are the pillars of effective case management. We provide expertise and clarity to complex medical issues, including identifying obstacles to the delivery of prompt quality health care treatment and coordinating resources. We are professionals who provide strategies to address challenges and ensure that care is patient-centered, safe, and effective. The key is in the coordination of care, with identified time frames for accomplishing appropriate care outcomes. Case management also provides a well-coordinated care experience to improve the care outcome, decrease the length of stay, and use multiple disciplines and services efficiently. Transitions of care for people with multiple, serious chronic illnesses are critical points for promoting quality of care and reducing preventable, expensive, and debilitating hospital admissions and readmissions as well as avoidable emergency department visits. Most people with multiple chronic illnesses, which are often accompanied by functional and cognitive deficits, cannot manage their care on their own. Wherever and however they originate, care transitions are about addressing change over time and this must be addressed in health care reform, which must support reimbursements accordingly. Case management is neither linear nor a one-way exercise, but rather a longitudinal approach across health care settings that is imperative to coordinate inpatient and postdischarge care. Facilitation, coordination, and collaboration occur throughout the client's health care encounter. Legal and Care Reform From a legal perspective, there is a myth and faulty belief among case managers and other experts that the standard of care is static, fixed, and permanent. The standard of care is a very important legal construct, as it is the standard against which we are judged in malpractice suits and licensing board hearings. Most broadly, the standard of care is defined as the usual and customary professional standard practice in the community. It describes the qualities and conditions that prevail, or should prevail, in a particular mental health service and that a reasonable, average, and prudent practitioner follows. Generally, as more therapists practice in a new and unique way, this new way gradually becomes part of the standard of care. The standard of care is derived from statutes, case law, licensing board regulations, consensus of the professionals and community, and ethical codes. The standard of care is not a standard of perfection, black and white, determined by outcome, permanent, or fixed. It does not follow any particular theoretical orientation, nor is it guided by risk management principles. Health care and case management are constantly changing, and it is our job as professionals, clinicians, and community members to make sure that we can continue to provide the highest level of care coordination possible for our citizens. We at CMSA feel that we are doing our best work to ensure the role of the professional case manager is known and respected by all health care professionals, policy makers, and consumers of health care services. Future of Case Management Anyone who reads the aforementioned discussion will recognize the importance, weight, and responsibility involved in being a case manager. The practice of case management is not easy, but the reward of rich relationships with clients, their families, and colleagues is immeasurable. We have come a long way in our educational endeavors, but we have more work that needs to be accomplished. If you are not already a member of CMSA, please visit cmsa.org to learn not only about how we are celebrating National Case Management Week but also about all of the resources we make available for you to be successful throughout the year in this wonderful practice. Truly, I am blessed to be a member and leader of CMSA and to learn from our membership each and every day. I often say that you were born caring, you worked hard to gain the experience, and with the right tools we can change the world. Finally, when you're having a rough day, remember this phrase: “I'm not saying I'm wonderwoman, I'm just saying no one has ever seen me and wonderwoman in a room together.” We are wonderwomen and men! During National Case Management Week 2018, we will celebrate the fabulous world of case management, right alongside you! Sincerely, Kathleen Fraser, MSN, MHA, RN-BC, CCM, CRRN CMSA Executive Director

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,378
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,273
Tête enseignante GPT0,522
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProfessional Case ManagementMême sujetClinical practice guidelines implementationTravaux en français237 207