MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2886639850

Regional subdivisions, sequences, correlations and facies relationships of the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, west-central Alberta to northeastern British Columbia, Canada — with emphasis on role of paleostructure

2018· article· en· W2886639850 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Graham R. Davies, Neil Watson, Thomas F. Moslow, James A. MacEachern

Notice bibliographique

RevueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiquePaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Établissements canadiensSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUnconformityGeologyPaleontologySiltstoneTransgressiveEarly TriassicFaciesExtinction eventPermianSedimentary rock
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Stratigraphic subdivisions and sequences established for the Lower Triassic Montney Formation based on extensive core control in west-central Alberta have been extended to the northern sector of northeastern British Columbia (NE BC). The paper draws extensively on unpublished data from multiple industry sources. The correlations are based on six (6) cross-sections incorporating 63 wells with a cumulative section length of over 1000 kms. The cross-sections are presented in two formats: proportionally-spaced LAS log sections, included as text figures; equally-spaced raster log sections with extensive labels (including selected core summaries) in an appendix. The Montney in this paper is divided into three unconformity-bounded, third-order sequences. The divisions and their internal subdivisions (from base up) are: the Griesbachian-Dienerian Lower Montney, built up by transgressive and highstand systems tracts; the Smithian Middle Montney, with a basal lower Smithian lowstand wedge, a ‘mid’ Smithian transgressive systems tract, and a thick mid to upper Smithian highstand systems tract; the Spathian Upper Montney, with a basal lower Spathian lowstand wedge, and an overlying mid to upper Spathian siltstone unit (the former Lower Doig Siltstone of earlier GDGC reports) built up by a basal transgressive systems tract and an upper highstand systems tract. The bounding unconformities for these Montney divisions (from the base up) are: the global first-order Permian-Griesbachian unconformity and sequence boundary (SB), a complex, multi-event, paleokarst boundary correlative with Permo-Triassic mass extinction event/s (base Lower Montney); the global third-order Dienerian-Smithian unconformity and SB (Lower to Middle Montney boundary); the global third-order Smithian-Spathian unconformity and SB (Middle to Upper Montney boundary); and the global second-order Spathian-Anisian unconformity and SB (Upper Montney to Doig boundary). Paleostructure on the Paleozoic unconformity below the Montney is a key control on the thickness of the total Montney, and of thicknesses of internal subdivisions, of facies, and of depositional trends. Upper Devonian Leduc reef and platform margins are the principal controls on Montney paleostructure from the southern Peace River arch area southeastward into south-central Alberta, while reactivated basement faults, including the Dawson Creek Graben Complex (DCGC) and the Hay River Fault Zone (HRFZ), are the major paleostructural controls northward into NE BC. Paleostructure is expressed best by third-order residual structure mapping of the top-Paleozoic unconformity, with three residual structure map-figures incorporating cross-section overlays included in this paper. A paleostructural location summary is included below each well log on the raster cross-sections. In the mid 1990s, preliminary biostratigraphic dating of the Montney in west-central Alberta was based on palynology. Within the last five years or so, new conodont biostratigraphic dating of the Montney in NE BC, from one published source but mainly from data released for this paper by Progress Energy Canada, has provided strong support for the proposed ages of subdivisions in the mid to upper Middle Montney (mid to late Smithian) and throughout the Upper Montney (early, mid, late Spathian). The only apparent discrepancy between conodont age dates and log-based lithostratigraphic picks and correlations in this paper centre around the placement of the Dienerian-Smithian (Lower to Middle Montney) boundary. As all conodont-dated wells lie within or peripheral to the HRFZ or other basement faults, structural movement may be a factor in this apparent discrepancy, but it is more likely due to uncertainties concerning the age range of key conodont species around or across the Dienerian-Smithian boundary, and of some stratigraphic picks. Some of the most intense bioturbation observed by the first author in any Montney cores occurs in the updip, shallower part of the lower Spathian lowstand wedge in westernmost Alberta and NE BC (where it is productive). A similar bioturbated interval also is recognized now in the updip, shallower part of the lower Smithian lowstand wedge in west-central Alberta. Ichnological analysis included in this paper demonstrates that the ichnogenera in both wedges essentially are the same, albeit more robust in the Spathian wedge. Extensive cryptobioturbation in HCS-dominant event beds in the upper Middle Montney enhances reservoir properties. The subdivisions, correlations and nomenclature for the Montney defined in this paper may stir some disagreement, but should serve as a base for an eventual industry-wide nomenclature and subdivision framework for the Montney.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,808

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,161
Écart entre enseignants0,153 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations46
Publié2018
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyMême sujetPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsTravaux en français237 207