MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2887284835 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy475

Reply to Darcis and Berkhout

2018· letter· en· W2887284835 sur OpenAlexaff
Ingeborg E A Wijting, Cynthia Lungu, Bart Rijnders, Hanh Thi Pham, Thibault Mésplède, Suzan D. Pas, Jolanda J.C. Voermans, Rob Schuurman, David van de Vijver, Patrick H. M. Boers, Rob A. Gruters, Charles A. Boucher, Jeroen J. A. van Kampen

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesVereniging Trustfonds Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Mots-clésMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor—With interest we read the comment by Darcis and Berkhout on our article about human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) resistance dynamics in patients failing maintenance monotherapy with the second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) [1]. Indeed, caution is warranted when stating that DTG does not elicit resistance in vivo. There is no complete picture yet of which mutations are relevant for DTG resistance in clinical practice. For example, Pham et al recently validated the S230R mutation that is associated with low-level resistance against DTG [2]. Still, no known resistance-associated mutations have been detected in the majority of virologic failures on DTG. The effect of mutations outside integrase on INSTI susceptibility has recently received increasing attention. An in vitro study by Malet et al showed that mutations in the highly conserved 3ʹ-polypurine tract (3ʹ-PPT) can lead to high-level resistance against DTG and other INSTIs [3]. Subsequently, we presented evidence that INSTI resistance via 3ʹ-PPT mutations can occur in patients treated with DTG [4]. The mechanism of 3ʹ-PPT–mediated INSTI resistance remains unknown. DTG excluding mutations in the HIV long terminal repeat end, which is the substrate of HIV integrase [5], or replication of unintegrated HIV [6] have been proposed as alternative mechanisms for DTG resistance. Current HIV genotypic resistance tests focus on mutations within the genes targeted by the antiretroviral drugs. In addition to DTG resistance mutations outside integrase, mutations outside HIV protease have been shown to contribute to HIV protease inhibitor resistance [7]. Thus, a more holistic view of antiretroviral drug resistance is needed. Given the availability of feasible HIV full-genome sequencing at relatively low costs, this should be implemented for resistance testing, in particular for cases of unexplained treatment failure (eg, adequate drug levels and no resistance-associated mutations detected in integrase). To fill in this gap, a global Registry On Second-gEneration inTegrase inhibiTor fAilures (ROSETTA) has been established [8]. ROSETTA aims to provide a global surveillance for virologic failure to second-generation INSTIs and other HIV inhibitors, and links HIV sequences to clinical and virological information. Furthermore, full-length HIV sequencing will be offered to its contributors, and candidate mutations possibly associated with resistance may be validated by phenotyping. This approach should develop a better and more complete understanding of resistance against INSTIs and other antiretroviral drug classes in clinical practice. Financial support. This work was supported by the Erasmus Trustfonds. Potential conflicts of interest. I. E. A. W. reports receiving personal financial support from Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work. B. J. A. R. reports receiving research grants from Erasmus Trustfonds during the conduct of the study; receiving research grants from Gilead and MSD outside the context of this work; receiving personal financial support from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), and GL Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work; receiving travel grants from BMS, MSD, ViiV, Gilead, and AbbVie outside the submitted work; and participating in an advisory board organized by ViiV outside the submitted work. D. A. M. C. v. d. V. reports receiving grants from Gilead Sciences, MSD, ViiV, and Janssen and personal financial support from Janssen, all outside the submitted work. S. D. P. reports receiving consultancy and travel-related financial support from Luminex outside the submitted work. M. E. v. d. E. reports participating in an advisory board organized by ViiV (nonfinancial support) outside the submitted work. C. A. B. B. reports receiving speaker’s fees from ViiV outside the submitted work. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed. Presented in part: 15th European Meeting on HIV and Hepatitis, Rome, Italy, 7–9 June 2017. Abstract 14; 16th European AIDS Conference, Milan, Italy, 25–27 October 2017. Abstract PE16/6; 11th Netherlands Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 22 November 2017. Abstract O07.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,107
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,046
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,005
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,1070,069
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesMême sujetHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentTravaux en français237 207