Electronic cigarettes: adolescent health and wellbeing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We read with interest John N Newton and colleagues' Comment (Feb 6, p 639),1Newton JN Dockrell M Marczylo T Making sense of the latest evidence on electronic cigarettes.Lancet. 2018; 391: 639-642Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar in which they incorrectly state that “experimentation with ECs [electronic cigarettes] has had no detectable effect on youth smoking rates and increased availability of ECs has not interrupted declining trends in youth smoking in many countries”. We believe that this statement is incorrect and is not supported by evidence in the literature. Studies clearly show that experimenting with ECs is reversing the previous long-term reduction in teenage smoking.2Barrington-Trimis JL Urman R Leventhal AM et al.E-cigarettes, cigarettes, and the prevalence of adolescent tobacco use.Pediatrics. 2016; (published online July 11.)DOI:10.1542/peds.2015-3983Google Scholar Additionally, findings from a systematic review suggest that adolescents and young children who start with ECs are more likely to smoke cigarettes later in life than those who have not previously used ECs.3Soneji S Barrington-Trimis JL Wills TA et al.Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171: 788-797Crossref PubMed Scopus (511) Google Scholar The study authors3Soneji S Barrington-Trimis JL Wills TA et al.Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171: 788-797Crossref PubMed Scopus (511) Google Scholar also found consistent and strong evidence that EC use is associated with increased odds of subsequent initiation of cigarette smoking and current cigarette smoking status in adolescents. In the first-ever study designed to control susceptibility to cigarette smoking, adolescents who initiated EC use were more likely to smoke conventional cigarettes 1 year later and become daily smokers.4Hammond D Reid JL Cole AG Leatherdale ST Electronic cigarette use and smoking initiation among youth: a longitudinal cohort study.CMAJ. 2017; 189: e1328-e1336Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar Meanwhile, a congressionally mandated review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine of more than 800 peer-reviewed scientific studies on the health effects of ECs on adolescents concluded that “There is substantial evidence that e-cigarette use by youth and young adults increases their risk of ever using conventional cigarettes”.5National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and MedicinePublic health consequences of e-cigarettes. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2018Google Scholar Therefore, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's recommendation should be appropriately reflected in future paediatric clinical guidelines for EC use to prevent a future global tobacco epidemic. This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com on September 6, 2018 This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com on September 6, 2018 Making sense of the latest evidence on electronic cigarettesIn the UK, 2·85 million people (5·7% of adults) regularly use electronic cigarettes (ECs), almost all of whom are smokers or ex-smokers.1 Prevalence of EC use is similar in the USA2 but is lower in other European Union (EU) countries (average 2%).1 ECs produce an estimated 18 000 additional long-term ex-smokers in England each year;3 a recent update suggests that figure might be as high as 57 000.1 Full-Text PDF Electronic cigarettes: adolescent health and wellbeing – Authors' replyWe thank all correspondents for their interest in our Comment.1 Full-Text PDF Electronic cigarettes: adolescent health and wellbeingThe Comment by John N Newton and colleagues1 would have been more credible if it had been consistently based on evidence. The authors claim that the findings of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report2 are generally in line with the Public Health England evidence review,3 but differences of emphasis exist. Full-Text PDF Department of ErrorBandara AN, Mehrnoush V. Electronic cigarettes: adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet 2018; 392: 473. In this Correspondence, the corresponding author's email address was incorrect. This has been corrected online as of Sept 6, 2018. Full-Text PDF
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,106 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,030 | 0,054 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».