MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2887662642 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.hemmal17-ia06

Abstract IA06: Intratumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic escape in multiple myeloma

2017· article· en· W2887662642 sur OpenAlexaff
Rodger E. Tiedemann

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCD38Unfolded protein responseBiologyPlasma cellCancer researchBortezomibXBP1Multiple myelomaBone marrowStem cellEndoplasmic reticulumImmunologyCD34Cell biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a mature B cell neoplasm characterized by the accumulation of immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells (PC) within the bone marrow. Despite treatment advances, MM remains incurable in the majority of patients and is over-represented in current cancer death rates. The lack of reliable cure in MM, despite the achievement of deep clinical responses with proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and myeloablative melphalan, implicates the presence of intratumoral heterogeneity and the existence of drug-resistant cells with tumorigenic capacity. However, the molecular and cellular basis of this intratumoral heterogeneity remains only partially understood. Using sequential FACS and single-cell immunofluorescence-FISH or genomics strategies, we have identified clonal tumor progenitor subpopulations within the bone marrow of MM patients that recapitulate the physiologic maturation stages between post-germinal center B cells and plasma cells. These clonal MM subpopulations include tumor cells that resemble CD20+ CD27+ CD38- CD138- Irf4- Xbp1s- memory B cells, CD38+/- CD138- Irf4- Xbp1s- pre-plasmablasts, CD38+ CD138- Irf4+ XBP1s+ plasmablasts, and tumor-bulk CD38+ CD138+ IRF4+ Xbp1s+ plasma cells. Importantly, compared to tumor bulk plasma cells, early Xbp1s- tumor progenitor cells appear innately resistant to mainstay treatment with proteasome inhibitors (PI). Mechanistically, absence of Ire1-Xbp1 signaling in these primitive MM cells is associated with secretory immaturity; as Xbp1s- MM cells produce less secretory immunoglobulin, an important determinant of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) load in PCs, they experience less ER stress than Xbp1s+ cells and are thus less susceptible to induction of cytotoxic ER stress when ER-associated degradation (ERAD) is inhibited by PIs. Significantly, small numbers of Xbp1s- tumor cells can be detected in most MMs and as these progenitor cells are innately insensitive to PI-induced cytotoxic ER stress, these observations can conceivably account for a universal low level resistance that is inherent in the pathogenesis and residual progenitor structure of MM and that prevents PI-induced cure. While these findings may account for some clinical features of MM, at present it remains unknown whether or not Xbp1s- MM tumor progenitors are fully malignant or if they possess the capacity required to reinitiate MM disease. Plausibly, Xbp1s- pre-plasma cells in MM may instead represent a counterpart to the premalignant preleukemic stem cells identified in AML, CLL and HCL, or may alternatively represent dedifferentiated PCs. Although this heterogeneity in tumor cell maturation may contribute to therapeutic evasion, MM tumors also commonly contain multiple genetic subclones that show tidal dominance under therapeutic pressure that may also facilitate treatment escape. Such genetic heterogeneity is not mutually exclusive with diversity in tumor cell maturation. When MM genetic subclones with common recurrent secondary chromosomal structural abnormalities (such as del 13, del 17p, +1q or del 1p) are identified among tumor bulk PCs, similar subclones may also be identified amongst non-PC Irf4- Xbp1s- MM subpopulations; this suggests that tumor progenitor cells may play a role in the genetic evolution of tumors and may represent a reservoir for subclonal relapse. In support of a model in which MM PCs can be replenished from MM progenitor cells, primary Xbp1s- MM progenitors possess the ability to differentiate in vitro into mature Xbp1s+ MM plasma cells. Notably, however, in contrast to a model in which MM PCs are continuously replenished by MM progenitors, we have also identified some genetic events that appear to show restricted representation among tumor PCs, consistent with MM PCs comprising a self-sustaining tumorigenic population in its own right. Overall, these data support a model in which Xbp1s- progenitor subpopulations in MM represent a reservoir of innately PI-resistant cells that, following eradication of tumorigenic PCs, may give rise to clonally related clinical relapse via MM progenitor cell differentiation. Overall these findings imply that treatment strategies in MM need to better address Xbp1s- IRF4- tumor stem/progenitor cells, while also eradicating MM-bulk PCs, to achieve deeper treatment responses and cure for patients. Citation Format: Rodger E. Tiedemann. Intratumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic escape in multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second AACR Conference on Hematologic Malignancies: Translating Discoveries to Novel Therapies; May 6-9, 2017; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(24_Suppl):Abstract nr IA06.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,299
Tête enseignante GPT0,534
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Cancer Research→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→