A Protocol-Driven, Digital Conversational Agent at the Hospital Bedside to Support Nurse Teams and to Mitigate Delirium and Falls Risk
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Up to 1 million falls per year occur during hospital stays in the US, costing hospitals up to $7 billion per year to treat. Delirium, a major cause of falls, is highly prevalent (29%-64%) among hospitalized elders. Our team is developing a care technology that provides 24x7 proactive patient support to mitigate falls and delirium in a scalable, cost-effective, yet person-centered manner. We were awarded an NIH SBIR Fast-Track grant to further our work. Objective: Prior research showed that digital avatars can build psychosocially supportive relationships with older adults living in the community. We conducted a pilot study of these digital avatars in a community hospital setting, and found that bedside avatars helped reduce the rate of falls among elderly inpatients while mitigating delirium and loneliness. Thus, in our present NIH-funded work, we seek to enhance the clinical robustness of our avatar intervention by implementing a more complete set of protocols derived from the evidence-based Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP), and to validate the benefits of this next-generation intervention in a larger scale, multi-site clinical study. Methods: Avatars are displayed on tablets as virtual dogs or cats, responding to touch. They are able to talk intelligently due to live support from a 24x7 team of trained humans combined with protocol guidance and process automation software. At the bedside, avatars talk with patients and implement protocols including reorientation and bed exercises, based on HELP. English-speaking patients aged 65+ on three medical surgical units were selected in our pilot study based on subjective nursing risk assessment and patient consent. Participants on two intervention units received an avatar for their entire hospital stay. Participants on a control unit received a daily visit from a nursing student. Measures were administered upon study enrollment and discharge. Quarterly fall rates by unit were reported by the hospital. In our present work, we will conduct a larger, multi-site clinical study starting with two hospitals in late 2018 and incorporating electronic medical record integration to increase the objectivity of patient enrollment, ease the patient enrollment process, and apply interventions intelligently tailored to each patient. Additional hospitals may join the two-year study through 2020. Results: In our pilot study, intervention (n=41) and control (n=54) patients were equivalent except for an intervention group bias toward females (P=.02). Mean age was 76.5 years, with 55% female, 46% African-American, and 44% speaking English as a second language. Typical length of stay was 3-6 days. On average, avatars performed 71.3 observational check-ins, 61 minutes of engagement using 11.5 images or audio files, and 6.5 protocol-driven tasks per patient per day. Compared to control patients, intervention patients showed a significantly greater reduction in delirium score (CAM, P=.003) and loneliness (UCLA-LS, P=.008). The primary intervention unit had 0.9 falls per 1000-patient days during the 3-month study period, compared to 6.5 on the control unit (86% reduction). Conclusions: Previous findings support the use and development of avatar technology for hospitalized patients at risk for delirium or falls. Hospitals interested in joining our two-year clinical study may contact the principal investigator.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle