MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2889044850 · doi:10.1353/dqt.2018.0022

More Newly Identified Contributors to Household Words

2018· article· en· W2889044850 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDickens quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration, Policy, and Dickens Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Manitoba
Mots-clésListing (finance)IrishGeorge (robot)HistoryGenealogyLiteratureClassicsArt historyArtLinguisticsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

More Newly Identified Contributors to Household Words Jeremy Parrott In my previous article on this topic for Dickens Quarterly (June 2018) I threw down the gauntlet to other scholars to find still further unknown or scantily identified contributors to Household Words, building on the groundwork of Ann Lohrli in the 1970s, but using the methods of twenty-first century digital genealogy. However, I was unable to resist my own challenge, and soon found myself once again sifting through the scattered online traces of obscure nineteenth century lives in pursuit of occasional writers for Dickens’s weekly magazine of the 1850s. I guessed that perhaps 10 to 20 more contributors could be pinned down from the available clues and having, at the time of writing, found substantial quantities of new information about 16 minimally defined entities in Lohrli’s 1973 guide to the journal, am at least temporarily drawing a line again under this research project. The first unidentified writer that I attempted to winkle out was the very first in Lohrli’s alphabetical listing of some 390 named contributors–Elizabeth Addey. The available information was her name, a Dublin address and the name George Addey as the registered proprietor of a business at that address. The Irish records are notoriously patchy and unreliable, but occasionally one happens upon an unexpected profusion of data. In the case of the Addeys, this took the form of the meticulous records of meetings of the Society of Friends (Quakers) in Dublin, Wexford and Cork, and the service history of George Addy (spelt without the ‘e’) in the Irish Constabulary. A similar wealth of narrowly focused information was available about another, otherwise poorly documented Irish contributor, Peter Dowdall, thanks to the manuscript records of the Court of Petty Sessions for County Galway and minutes of board meetings regarding the administration of the Poor Law in Dublin. Several of the writers proved quite exciting to work on as I gradually peeled back layers of their lives. Taking just one of these as a model, A. L. V. Gretton was only known by her initials or as the wife of a George Gretton and as a writer on Italy. First I restored her full name–Amelia Louisa [End Page 189] Vaux née Le Mesurier–then found out that her English husband was an officer in the Hungarian hussars and died in Australia just nine days after the young couple had arrived in Adelaide to start a new life together! The realization that she was also a published novelist and personally acquainted with Dickens, having met him in Genoa in 1845 (Letters 6: 765, n.4), added considerably to the interest I had already taken in her. Then to discover that her correspondence with other family members over a 40-year period from Italy, Australia and Britain, had been collected and recently published online, was a totally unexpected boon. In several instances I found that Lohrli had made tentative attributions and then extrapolated from the content of the HW pieces to construct a fragmentary synchronic snapshot of the writers–whoever they were. Thus, for example, I knew from Lohrli that Francis Gwynne was a squatter in New South Wales. We are given the names of several brothers and are informed about some of their movements and transactions in the 1850s. However, Lohrli had no idea where Francis was born or died, who his parents were, how and when he got to Australia, nor what happened to him after the 1850s. In Gwynne’s case, patient trawling through the census data, births, marriages and deaths and migration records of Britain and Australia throughout the nineteenth century, enabled me to piece together the skeleton life of a younger son of a gentleman farmer in West Wales, migrating with three of his brothers (and, for a time, his father and step-mother) to the frontier lands of the Australian outback. One of his brothers died young, another went bankrupt, but Francis Gwynne made a success of his hard-bitten life as a cattle rancher, bought a town-house in Kensington and retired to London as an English (Welsh-Australian) gentleman. In 1900 he was buried in the churchyard of the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,481
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle