Seasonal Adjustment and Forecasting of Croatian GDP under Differebt Scenarios
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Forecasting Croatian GDP has proved to be difficult task, not only in the past which includes war for independence, but also nowadays. A lot more outliers and irregularities were detected in the period 1990-1995 than later, when economic situation has been stabilised. In this paper we examine seasonal adjustment using two different methods: X-12-ARIMA which is said to be ad hoc method (empirically based) and TRAMO/SEATS which is model-based method. Even though empirically based methods are still dominating statistical agencies throughout the world, model based method TRAMO/SEATS has been considered as a very serious contender. We have applied both methods on Croatian GDP series and have compared obtained results. The period covered was form 1st quarter 1997 until 4th quarter 2004, fixed prices. The overall seasonal adjustment quality index for X-12-ARIMA was 2.169 and 2.085 for TRAMO/SEATS thus giving the advantage for model-based method. X-12-ARIMA used correction for trading days effect, and detected no outlier, while TRAMO/SEATS detected one outlier in 4th quarter 1997. This method has proved to be better in detection of outliers. Statistics on residuals for both methods were satisfactory, but some statistics have not been performed with X-12-ARIMA because the series was not long enough. Forecast errors were within the tolerant limits. Forecasting the future Croatian GDP is not only statistical task, but also it has some political weight. Since the Croatian approach towards EU has been slowed, GDP could be slightly lower in the first quarter of 2005 than expected. Altogether, both methods produces acceptable results since the GDP series was not difficult to adjust and to forecast, but we think TRAMO/SEATS method produced better results, both in the quality of seasonal adjustment and the quality of forecasting. TRAMO/SEATS has produced slightly higher forecast for the next three years.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle