MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2889662294 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30379-6

Essentials of Global Health: a book for students, by students

2018· letter· en· W2889662294 sur OpenAlexaff
Anand Bhopal, Daniel Knights, Felicity Knights, Laura Bertani, Anya Göpfert, Renzo Guinto, Freya Langham, Alex Lefèbvre, Eleanor Turner-Moss, Waruguru Wanjau, Elizabeth Wiley, Parveen Kumar, Babulal Sethia

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Global Health · 2018
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Health and Surgery
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlobal healthBachelorSolidarityGlobalizationScopusPolitical sciencePower (physics)Public relationsSociologyLibrary scienceMedicineHealth careMEDLINELawPoliticsComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

At the turn of the millennium, a Lancet Editorial1The LancetEducating doctors for world health.Lancet. 2001; 358: 1471Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar opened with the following sentence: “If one word comes to define the 21st century, it is likely to be globalisation.” Around the same time the first bachelor's degrees in international health were being introduced; and nearly 20 years later the question is: will there be enough jobs for global health professionals?2Eichbaum Q Evert J Hall T Will there be enough jobs for trained global health professionals?.Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4: e692-e693Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar As an act of solidarity in the fallout of World War 2, the International Federation of Medical Students' Associations (IFMSA) was formed in 1951 by medical students from ten European countries. Today, the IFMSA represents 1·3 million medical students from 127 countries, active in drawing attention to the dimensions of power that shape health inequalities and their upstream determinants, underpinned by the legitimacy of its truly global membership. In 2012 a meeting between Babulal Sethia and Parveen Kumar, both recent Presidents of the Royal Society of Medicine (London, UK), and representatives from Students for Global Health (then known as Medsin) catalysed the genesis of a novel idea: a global health textbook for students, by students. What ensued was a comprehensively collaborative process, with young people co-designing the content outline, recruiting internationally diverse authors (drawing heavily from the IFMSA network), and editing initial drafts of submissions. After 6 years of perseverance, the first edition of Essentials of Global Health was officially launched on April 12, 2018, at the Royal Society of Medicine in London, celebrating a partnership that drew on the energy and motivation of students and the expertise of senior editors. This book provides a useful model for future endeavours. The project drew together more than 120 students and young professionals from over 30 countries, ranging from the Netherlands to Nigeria, representing the diversity of global voices widely recognised as key to success throughout international development. The result is a concise yet comprehensive pocket-sized summary of subjects as varied as universal health coverage, non-communicable diseases, and natural disasters, alongside an introduction to key principles, concepts, and tensions in global health debates. It is infused with the dynamism of a generation of authors moving beyond theoretical understanding to advocacy and action. Throughout the book, case studies highlight what young people across the world are already doing to positively effect global health. Globalisation poses implicit threats, but also opportunities for global health. Essentials of Global Health simultaneously helps the community to better understand these factors while harnessing the multidirectional flow of people, ideas, and opportunities of an increasingly interconnected world. As is powerfully articulated by the young authors throughout this book, injustices can no longer be seen as unfortunate circumstances to tolerate, but problems that a growing movement is determined to overcome. For details about purchasing the Essentials of Global Health book see https://www.elsevier.com/books/essentials-of-global-health/sethia/978-0-7020-6607-8# For details about purchasing the Essentials of Global Health book see https://www.elsevier.com/books/essentials-of-global-health/sethia/978-0-7020-6607-8# The royalties from the Essentials of Global Health book are being donated to a grant fund for student global health projects. Elsevier is committed to ensuring the book is widely available in low-income countries. Please contact Elsevier for further details. The book is available for purchase online. We declare no competing interests. Will there be enough jobs for trained global health professionals?At the Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH) annual conference in San Francisco in April, leading educators in breakout session discussions expressed concern at the increasing number of global health programmes being offered at universities in high-income countries in Europe and North America. Student demand for global health training is clearly robust, but we don't yet know much about the demand side of the global health training–employment equation. Global health trainers and trainees are increasingly concerned that the output of people trained for, and seeking jobs in, global health may outstrip job opportunities in the field. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,060

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,005
Communication savante0,0120,011
Science ouverte0,0020,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,014
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,451
Écart entre enseignants0,412 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Global HealthMême sujetGlobal Health and SurgeryTravaux en français237 207