MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2890766073

Treatment Plans and Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Disorders

2001· article· en· W2890766073 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin M. Antony

Notice bibliographique

RevueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychiatric care and mental health services
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPanic disorderAgoraphobiaPsychologyAnxietyPsychotherapistCognitive therapyCognitionSession (web analytics)Specific phobiaGeneralized anxiety disorderPsychiatryAnxiety disorderCognitive behavioral therapyPsychological interventionClinical psychologyMajor depressive disorder
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This book is one of the latest additions to the Clinician's Toolbox series from Guilford Press. It is written by 2 psychologists with a wealth of experience in providing cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) to individuals suffering from depression and anxiety disorders, as well as in training clinicians to administer CBT. The authors have also published several other practical books on cognitive therapy for practitioners. Leahy and Holland provide step-by-step CBT protocols, adapted from manuals that have been extensively tested at research centres around the world. The protocols are written for the clinician who may be constrained with respect to the number of sessions that he or she can offer, as well as by the length of time available for each session. The first chapter provides an overview of issues related to CBT in managed care settings. The 7 chapters that follow provide treatment plans for particular syndromes, including depression, panic disorder and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, specific phobia, and obsessive–compulsive disorder. The structure of chapters 2 through 8 is similar; each begins with a description of the disorder in question and suggestions for differential diagnosis. The authors review behavioural and cognitive models for the disorder, provide information regarding other contributing factors and briefly review the research on cognitive behavioural treatments for the disorder. An overview of assessment and treatment strategies is provided next, followed by a case example and a detailed, session-by-session description of the treatment. Each chapter also has a section on trouble-shooting and an appendix, which details how to administer particular behavioural and cognitive interventions. Overall, Leahy and Holland provide an excellent overview of cognitive and behavioural strategies for treating anxiety. Strengths that warrant mentioning include: comprehensive forms, which can be used to facilitate the initial clinical assessment; excellent handouts and questionnaires for patients; and a CD-ROM containing reproducible copies of all handouts and forms, as well as expanded information about cognitive behavioural techniques and medications. Generally, the treatments recommended in this book are consistent with the research on CBT for anxiety disorders and depression. However, there are a few exceptions where certain treatment interventions are recommended despite a lack of research supporting their use for the disorder being discussed. For example, they recommend a 6-session treatment for specific phobias that includes imaginal exposure, in vivo exposure, relaxation training and cognitive therapy. However, it is well established that most individuals with specific phobias (e.g., of animals, blood, needles) respond to 1 or 2 sessions of focused exposure, without these other interventions. In fact, another technique that is empirically supported for blood phobia (i.e., applied tension) is not discussed at all in the specific phobia chapter. In addition, relaxation training is included as a recommended treatment in all of the chapters on anxiety disorders, even though it is empirically supported only as a treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, and Appendix A recommends the use of thought-stopping and distraction for temporarily managing fear, despite the fact that most behavioural researchers recommend against using these strategies. A second limitation of the book concerns the sections on assessment measures for anxiety disorders. These sections do not include the most important measures for assessing individuals with anxiety disorders. For example, the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (generally considered to be the gold standard assessment tool for obsessive–compulsive disorder) is not mentioned, nor are other important scales reviewed (e.g., Anxiety Sensitivity Index, Penn State Worry Questionnaire). Instead, regardless of the problem being assessed, most of the chapters tend to recommend using general measures of anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory), depression (Beck Depression Inventory) and personality disorders (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders). Some other measures recommended are either no longer the most current version (e.g., the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule, Revised, which is based on DSM-III-R criteria and has since been revised) or have been shown to have limited validity for measuring anxiety (e.g., State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). Despite these limitations, Treatment Plans and Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Disorders is an excellent resource, filled with useful information that no clinician should be without. I highly recommend it for new therapists and students, as well as for experienced clinicians. Martin M. Antony, PhD, C Psych Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,569
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,479

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Même sujetPsychiatric care and mental health servicesTravaux en français237 207