PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

2018· article· en· 40 431 citations· W2891378911 sur OpenAlex· 10.7326/m18-0850

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.

Organisme subventionnaire canadienUn organisme canadien l'a financé. Le travail peut ne porter aucune affiliation canadienne.

Résumé

Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue: Annals of Internal Medicine
Thématique: Delphi Technique in Research
Domaine: Social Sciences
Établissements canadiens: Queen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaOttawa HospitalCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnaires: Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWorld Health Organization
Mots-clés: ChecklistSystematic reviewTerminologyMedicineGuidelineHealth careQuality (philosophy)Medical educationMEDLINEManagement scienceKnowledge managementProcess managementPsychologyComputer scienceEngineering
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex: oui
API: /api/v1/works/W2891378911