Effect of gender of new-born, antenatal care and postnatal care on breastfeeding practices in Ethiopia: Evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis of national studies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association of gender of new-born, antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) with timely initiation of breastfeeding (TIBF) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) practice in Ethiopia. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis Methods PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, WHO Global Health Library, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases systematically searched and complemented by manual searches to retrieve all available literature. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality assessment of included studies. Egger’s regression test at p-value threshold ≤ 0.01 was used to examine publication bias. Cochran’s Q X 2 test, τ 2 , and I 2 statistics were used to test heterogeneity, estimate amount of total/residual heterogeneity and measure variability attributed to heterogeneity respectively. A meta-analysis using a weighted inverse variance random-effects model was performed. The trend of evidence over time was evaluated by performing a cumulative meta-analysis. Furthermore, mixed-effects meta-regression analysis was done to identify possible sources of heterogeneity. Results Of 523 articles retrieved, 17 studies (N = 26,146 mothers) on TIBF and 27 studies (N = 17,819 mothers) on EBF were included in the final analysis. ANC (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.65 -3.04, p <0.001, I 2 = 90.9%), PNC (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.41 - 2.47, p <0.001, I 2 = 63.4%) and gender of new-born (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.68, p = 0.04, I 2 = 81.7%) significantly associated with EBF. In addition, ANC (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.10 - 2.65, p = 0.02, I 2 = 93.1%) was significantly associated with TIBF but not gender of new-born (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 -1.21, p = 0.82, I 2 = 66.2%). Conclusions In line with our hypothesis, gender of new-born, ANC and PNC significantly associated with EBF. Likewise, ANC significantly associated with TIBF. Optimal care during pregnancy and after birth is important to ensure adequate breastfeeding. This meta-analysis study provided evidence on breastfeeding practices and its associated factors in Ethiopian context, which can be useful for cross-country and cross-cultural comparison and for breastfeeding improvement initiative in Ethiopia. Protocol registration and publication: CRD42017056768 and 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-017437 Strengths and limitations of this study This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the registered and published protocol. Since it is the first study in Ethiopia, the information could be helpful for future researchers, public health practitioners, and healthcare policymakers. Almost all included studies were observational which may hinder causality inference. Perhaps the results may not be nationally representative given that studies from some regions are lacking. Based on the conventional methods of the heterogeneity test, a few analyses suffer from high between-study variation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,049 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,018 | 0,037 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».