Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The use of aerial tramways is becoming common in cities as a way to provide reliable, safe, sustainable, and cost-effective mass transportation. The aerial tramway is especially effective in the most congested areas of major cities. The growth of Boise State University (BSU) and downtown Boise makes this location especially attractive for a tramway. Moreover, based on data collected for this analysis, it is clear that the BSU community is open to using the tramway instead of more traditional modes of transportation. The viability of the tramway is further enhanced because the computer science department has moved to City Center Plaza, which is located near the intersection of Main Street and Capitol Boulevard, in the middle of downtown Boise. BSU students, staff and faculty need a convenient mode of transportation to travel between the BSU campus and the Computer Science building. People currently incur substantial costs, both in terms of parking fees and time spent commuting a relatively short distance. Parking in downtown Boise is difficult to find and expensive. Travel between the BSU campus and downtown is not limited to activities of the students and staff of the university. Several large sporting and cultural destinations are located in the area. While the traffic congestion in Boise does not compare with that of other large Western United States and Canadian cities, it is clear that there is room for improvement as Idahoans incur an opportunity cost of $16.79 for every hour they spend stopped in traffic The aerial tramway, although not new, has been recently popularized because of the well-known tram in nearby Portland. Trams have a reputation for safety and reliability and can accommodate large numbers of trips at very low incremental cost. As utilization increases, the fixed costs are spread among more riders and the tram’s profitability can be substantial. Trams can become a key component of an area’s mass transit infrastructure. This study finds that an aerial tramway is feasible and economically viable based on data collected from students, faculty, and staff of BSU. A survey of 1430 respondents about the perceived convenience and costs relative to other transportation modes indicates a significant demand for tram services. Even though there is no historical demand for tram services at BSU, a stated preference approach allows the researcher to ask hypotheticals about the factors that are most closely tied to the viability of the project. Survey responses were statistically
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,041 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».