A direct demonstration of functional TRPV1 in Cajal–Retzius cells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel is responsible for detecting noxious heat and the ‘spicy’ (i.e. capsaicin) sensation. These highly Ca2+-permeable non-selective cation channels are gated by pH and endovanilloids such as anandamide (AEA). TRPV1 functional responses in the brain have been reported by several groups using a diversity of techniques ranging from immunohistochemistry to knockout animals and pharmacological effects on plasticity. For example, Gibson et al. (2008) reported immunohistochemical expression of TRPV1 in hippocampus and functional effects of the channel's agonists (i.e. capsaicin) and antagonists (i.e. capsazapine) on long-term depression at excitatory synapses onto interneurons (Gibson et al. 2008). In contrast, Cavanaugh et al. (2011) detected no TRPV1 in hippocampal pyramidal neurons of a reporter mouse line. They also failed to find capsaicin-induced changes in Ca2+ (Cavanaugh et al. 2011). This has sparked controversy surrounding the functional presence of TRPV1 in the hippocampus. Other groups have shown that postsynaptic TRPV1 in dentate granule cells can induce an LTD-like response when activated by AEA (Chávez et al. 2010). The same group (Castillo) also later reported a compartmentally specific role for TRPV1 in AEA-mediated suppression of somatic GABA responses. Despite these convincing papers, they all failed to show direct TRPV1 ion currents or changes in intracellular Ca2+, providing critics with a solid foundation to doubt the presence of TRPV1 because alternative channels, such as TRPV4, could be involved. The only way to assuage these criticisms would be the direct demonstration of TRPV1 currents and functional responses in the hippocampus. In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Anstötz and colleagues report that Cajal–Retzius (CR) cells in the hippocampus express functional TRPV1 channels that have a role in the activation of GABAergic interneurons in the molecular layer (Anstötz et al. 2018) It is interesting to note that the CR cells were the only hippocampal cell type reported by Cavanaugh et al. to express TRPV1. It has been known since the 1990s that CR cells innervate the several regions of the hippocampal formation, including the cornu Ammonis (CA) and dentate gyrus (Anstötz et al. 2016). In the present work, Anstötz and colleagues have built on this anatomical description to demonstrate active and functional TRPV1 channels. Central to their ability to probe the potential functional expression of TRPV1 in CR cells was the generation of reporter mice and TRPV1 knockouts. They first showed robust increases in intracellular Ca2+ in response to the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin in identified CR cells using slices from the Wnt3a-GCaMP6s mouse line. This confirmed that these capsaicin-induced increases in Ca2+ did not require network activity, making this, to the best of my knowledge, the first demonstration of direct TRPV1-mediated Ca2+ changes in hippocampal cells. Further confirmation of active plasmalemma TRPV1 was obtained with Ca2+ imaging in nominally Ca2+ free extracellular solutions and in voltage-clamp, where capsaicin-induced inward currents (at −60 mV) were recorded in acute slices from CXCR4-EGFP or Wnt3a-tdTomato mice. As expected, capsaicin-activated currents were absent in the CXCR4-EGFP TRPV1−/− mice. While it would have been interesting to see the entire current–voltage relationship of CR TRPV1 (a task that is possible in these high-input resistance cells), the data show a convincing role for these enigmatic channels in hippocampal cells. A further interesting observation was that TRPV1 was detected only in about half of the CR cells evaluated. The reason for this is unclear, but the authors suggest two possibilities: that only half of CRs express TRPV1 or that in that population TRPV1 is inactivated by an as yet unidentified mechanism. A TRPV1-Cre line could help address this issue. So what might CR TRPV1 be doing? Considering that CR cells likely innervate both the dentate gyrus and CA layers, the authors postulated that CR TRPV1 may be involved in local hippocampal microcircuits. They focused on the effects of capsaicin on GABAergic interneurons of the molecular layers. Voltage-clamped interneurons from the CXCR4-EGFP TRPV1+/+ but not CXCR4-EGFP TRPV1−/− mice showed a dramatic increase in spontaneous glutamatergic EPSCs by capsaicin. A comparison of TRPV1 activation on molecular layer versus stratum oriens interneurons revealed a much more dramatic increase in sEPSC frequency in the former. This was supported by anatomical reconstructions to ensure the location of the interneurons. In summary, the demonstration by Anstötz et al. that CR neurons have functional TRPV1 channels that can influence synaptic transmission in the molecular layers of the hippocampus has interesting implications for physiology and pathology. The Ca2+ permeability of TRPV1 suggests that the channel in synaptic boutons could regulate neurotransmitter release, which is supported by Anstötz et al.’s work. It will be of interest to determine if CR synapses onto pyramidal neurons show a similar enhancement of sEPSC activity upon TRPV1 opening. Although not addressed in the current work, understanding the endogenous activation of TRPV1 in the hippocampus (i.e. without capsaicin application) is an important future goal to truly appreciate the physiological functions of these channels. Some possibilities include regulation of TRPV1 by AEA, as has been proposed in the dentate gyrus (Chávez et al. 2010), or by temperature, which could be an important mediator of febrile seizures. RJT's research is supported by grants from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). None declared.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».