Plasma metabolomics analysis in sickle cell disease patients with albuminuria – an exploratory study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, appears to be progressive in sickle cell disease (SCD) and is also associated with increased mortality in this condition (Ataga et al, 2014). Albuminuria is a risk factor for worsening kidney function (Ataga et al, 2014). Albuminuria and changes in glomerular filtration rate occur well after substantial structural and functional tissue damage have ensued (Guasch et al, 1996). Available biomarkers of CKD fail to provide information on underlying causal biochemical pathways, limiting the discovery of novel therapeutic or preventive measures. Metabolite profiling and the bioinformatics tools to study them may aid in the discovery of novel associations with disease markers that uncover pathophysiological pathways in SCD. This exploratory study evaluated plasma metabolomics profiles in SCD patients with and without albuminuria. SCD patients with normal albuminuria [urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) < 30 mg/g] and moderately or severely increased albuminuria (UACR ≥ 30 mg/g) were recruited from an adult sickle cell clinic. The study design and patient eligibility criteria have been previously described (Ataga et al, 2016). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All subjects gave written informed consent. Plasma samples (150 μl) were prepared by adding 0·9% saline solution (100 μl) containing 2·5 mmol/l formate (chemical shift indicator). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra of plasma samples were acquired on a Bruker Avance III 950 MHz NMR spectrometer using a Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill pulse sequence and 128 scans. NMR peaks were library-matched to metabolites and the relative concentration of metabolites was determined using Chenomx NMR Suite 8.1 Professional software (Chenomx, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) (Appendix S1). Orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was performed using SIMCA software (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Umea, Sweden). Variable influence on projection (VIP) plots were inspected and metabolites with a VIP ≥ 1·0 and a jack-knife confidence interval that did not include zero were considered important in differentiating the groups. Statistical analyses using the metabolite relative concentrations were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Hypothesis testing (two-sided) was conducted using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables. Fold-changes were calculated as the ratio of the median concentrations. There was no adjustment for multiple testing. Due to the small sample size, P < 0·1 were considered to be important associations. Plasma samples from 23 subjects with HbSS were analysed. One subject, with normal albuminuria and marked hyperbilirubinaemia, was removed from the analyses following concerns that his hyperbilirubinaemia might have falsely affected the spectral patterns. The median age of the remaining 22 subjects was 43·5 years, 12 were female, and 6 subjects had normal albuminuria (Table 1). There were differences between the albuminuria groups for systolic blood pressure (P = 0·04), diastolic blood pressure (P = 0·08) and fetal haemoglobin (P = 0·095). The albuminuria groups were distinguished by OPLS-DA (Fig 1) and the VIP plot is shown in Figure S1. Hypothesis testing found that higher levels of betaine and proline were associated with albuminuria (P = 0·04 and P = 0·07, respectively) (Table SI). Higher dimethylamine (DMA) level was also associated with albuminuria (P = 0·098), with a more than 200-fold change. OPLS-DA identified six metabolites important in differentiating subjects with albuminuria: betaine (VIP = 1·79), proline (VIP = 1·69), DMA (VIP = 1·54), glutamate (VIP = 1·30), leucine (VIP = 1·06) and lysine (VIP = 1·02). Urine levels of both DMA and proline are associated with proteinuria in patients with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (Kalantari et al, 2016), a common pathological finding in SCD glomerulopathy (Ataga et al, 2014). DMA, a product of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) metabolism, plays a role in nitric oxide (NO) modulation. The NO synthesis pathway is proposed to be associated with chronic renal failure (Vallance et al, 1992). A significant portion of ADMA, an endogenous inhibitor of NO synthases, is metabolized by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase to DMA and citrulline. The observed association of DMA with albuminuria suggests that its substrate, ADMA, may also be associated with albuminuria. Plasma ADMA is significantly higher in SCD subjects compared to controls, and is associated with haemolysis markers, levels of soluble adhesion molecules (Schnog et al, 2005), elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity and increased mortality. The association of DMA with albuminuria supports the hypothesis that endothelial dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of SCD-related glomerulopathy (Ataga et al, 2016). Proline, a non-essential amino acid synthesized from L-glutamate or arginine, was also associated with albuminuria. Proline build-up could be due to increased synthesis or decreased breakdown by the enzymes proline oxidase or proline dehydrogenase (PRODH), respectively. As the level of lactate, an inhibitor of PRODH, is elevated in SCD patients compared to control subjects following a shift towards anaerobic metabolism (Petto et al, 2011), high lactate levels may contribute to the development of albuminuria in SCD via increased proline levels. Plasma level of betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), an important methyl donor and osmolyte, was associated with albuminuria. Betaine, the major methyl donor for the enzyme betaine homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT), catalyses the re-synthesis of methionine from homocysteine. Mild elevation in plasma homocysteine is documented in SCD (Dhar et al, 2004). Although plasma homocysteine correlates with serum creatinine in SCD (Dhar et al, 2004), it is uncertain whether an increased homocysteine level contributes to renal dysfunction or accumulates with renal insufficiency. Urinary excretion of glycine betaine is elevated in kidney disease and in diabetes, but the elevation in diabetes is not correlated with microalbuminuria or plasma creatinine (Lever et al, 1994). Confirmatory studies are required to determine whether betaine could serve as an early indicator of SCD glomerulopathy. The significance of the relationship between changes in glutamate, lysine and leucine, and albuminuria in SCD is uncertain. However, alterations in glutamate are reported to predict the development of albuminuria in individuals with hypertension, while L-lysine is a potent inhibitor of renal tubule protein reabsorption (Gonzalez-Calero et al, 2016). We report, for the first time, metabolomic pathways associated with albuminuria in SCD. The association of DMA with albuminuria further highlights our finding of an association of albuminuria with impaired flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (Ataga et al, 2016). We also found associations of proline, glutamate, lysine and leucine with albuminuria. This study is limited by the small sample size and absence of a validation cohort. Our future goal is to conduct an adequately powered study to identify metabolites that could identify patients at increased risk of worsening CKD, and facilitate the development of novel therapies for SCD glomerulopathy. This work was supported by NIH grants R01HL111659 (LE, DRA, KIA), and the NIH Eastern Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Resource Core (ERCMRC), funded by the NIH Common Fund under grant U24 DK097193 (Sumner, PI). KIA designed the study and wrote the manuscript. LE assisted with study design and wrote the manuscript. WP performed the laboratory analysis and assisted in manuscript preparation. SM analysed the data and assisted in manuscript preparation. DRA assisted with study design and manuscript preparation. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».