MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2892556462 · doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000545100.48724.f3

Scleroderma and Person/Patient-Centered Concerns

2018· editorial· en· W2892556462 sur OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth A. Ayello, R. Gary Sibbald

Notice bibliographique

RevueAdvances in Skin & Wound Care · 2018
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Établissements canadiensToronto Public Health
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSclerodactylyScleroderma (fungus)TelangiectasiaDermatologyDiseaseCalcinosisPathologyCalcification

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

With the first issue of 2000, our journal’s title was changed to include the word skin and reflect the increasing recognition that our readers care for people with both skin and wound care needs.1 Some diseases, including scleroderma, have a significant impact on the skin. The disease process includes skin fibrosis, vascular abnormalities, and autoantibody production.2 Scleroderma often presents with a “woody” skin that loses its flexibility; can you imagine your skin being hard like a tree trunk, not moving, even with pushing and pulling? Limited scleroderma (a slower developing, more benign form of the disease) is usually distal to the neck, elbows, and knees with diffuse involvement having proximal lesions as well.2 The Scleroderma Foundation lists other problems encountered by persons with limited scleroderma.3 Known as the CREST syndrome, they are calcinosis or calcium deposits in the skin, Raynaud phenomenon (discoloration of digits with temperature change), esophageal dysfunction, sclerodactyly (woody hard digits), and telangiectasia (small linear arteriolar vessels on the skin surface). Remember, there are many types of scleroderma, and not all people who have scleroderma will have all of these symptoms—each person may have different combinations. Scleroderma often first presents with skin involvement or Raynaud phenomenon, but internal organs can also become involved. This month’s CE/CME highlights a literature review of scleroderma with earlier diagnosis and newer treatment modalities to address its symptoms. This is especially important given that there is no cure and patients are living longer with the disease. However, we should focus not only on the skin changes (“holes” or wounds, digital ulcers, and tight skin lesions) that a person may have, but also the “whole” person. Scleroderma is largely a rheumatologic disease that affects predominantly young females (30s–50s). We encourage you to think about how this disease impacts quality of life and the lifestyle changes that may be needed. This is especially important during a time of life when young persons are active, focused on their appearance, and the emphasis is on “doing” with their social peers. The restrictions on upper extremity movement that accompany scleroderma such as limited mobility and impaired joint motion are life altering. How does a younger person adjust and live his/her life with frequent, severe pain in the distal fingers and toes, or the risk for secondary infection, disfigurement, and even finger amputation from ischemia? Imagine not being able to open your mouth wide enough to eat solid foods comfortably, and then suffering abdominal pain from intestinal motility dysfunction. How does a person with scleroderma deal with painful calcium deposits on his/her fingertips? Fingers that are bent and will not straighten and flexed knees that inhibit normal gait have a profound social impact. Unfortunately, most current treatment does not improve skin flexibility, leaving only the option of frequently applying emollient moisturizers to hydrate the skin surface and prevent skin breakdown. Providers can still help relieve distal digit pain that may be associated with skin ulcers on the tips of the fingers and toes. Severe cases of distal digit ischemia may require intravenous prostaglandin inhibitors and hospitalization. Patients with less severe Raynaud phenomenon often respond to several options including an angiotensin inhibitor blocker (losartan), calcium-channel blocker (nifedipine), or phosphodiesterase type 5 antagonists (sildenafil, tadalafil). Warm gloves or socks along with nitroglycerine patches (12 hours on and 12 hours off but never with phosphodiesterase type 5 antagonists orally) can also improve activities of daily living for persons living with scleroderma. Nurse theorist Martha E. Rogers4 wrote about her humanistic science for the whole human being: “Man is a unified whole possessing his own integrity and manifesting characteristics that are more than and different from the sum of his parts.” Your editors-in-chief have adapted those words and do believe that the person with a “hole” (ie, a wound, ulcer, injury, or skin changes) is more than the sum of his/her parts. As skin and wound healers, we must always be aware of, assess, and address person/patient-centered concerns as part of the individual plan of care. Elizabeth A. Ayello, PhD, RN, CWON, ETN, MAPWCA, FAANFigureR. Gary Sibbald, BSc, MD, DSc (Hons), MEd, FRCPC (Med Derm), FAAD, MAPWCA, JMFigure

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,313
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAdvances in Skin & Wound CareMême sujetSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesTravaux en français237 207