MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2892693054

Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Monopile Foundations Supporting Offshore Wind Turbines

2018· dissertation· en· W2892693054 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Bipin Kumar Gupta

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Waterloo
Mots-clésOffshore wind powerWind powerMarine engineeringSubmarine pipelineEngineeringSoil structure interactionGeologyGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringFinite element methodElectrical engineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Monopile foundations supporting offshore wind turbines are hollow circular steel piles of diameter 4-6 m and a slenderness ratio (length/radius) of 10-12 driven into the seabed in an average water depth of 35 m. They are subjected to large lateral forces and overturning moments at the seabed level from wind, waves, and water currents acting on the wind turbine structure. Currently, they are designed using the p-y analysis method (p is the soil reaction force per unit length at any point along the pile shaft and y is the corresponding pile displacement at that point) which has a number of shortcomings. The p-y analysis was originally developed from a few full-scale field pile-load tests on small-diameter piles (less than 2 m in diameter) and their applicability to large-diameter monopiles is questionable. Besides, it is empirical, site-specific, and does not account for the three-dimensional pile-soil interaction important for large-diameter monopiles, thereby, resulting in a conservative design and an increase in the cost of the project. Three-dimensional finite element analysis can be used for the analysis and design of monopiles, but such analyses require significantly large computational time and effort besides, the specific expertise of finite element software that further limits its use in practice. 
\nThe primary objective of this thesis is to develop a computationally efficient continuum-based mathematical model that takes the three-dimensional monopile-soil interaction into account. In the thesis, three tasks are performed towards the development of the mathematical model. First, a mathematical framework is developed to analyze laterally loaded monopiles following the Timoshenko beam theory in a multilayered elastic soil deposit subjected to static lateral loading. In the analysis, it is shown that successive simplification of the analysis can lead to monopiles modeled as a Euler-Bernoulli and rigid beam. The analysis is verified with finite element solutions and the suitability of the application each of the beam theories to obtain monopile response (head-displacement and rotation) is also investigated besides, a comparison of the computational time between the present analysis and finite element analysis is also shown. In the second task, the aforementioned framework is extended to analyze monopiles embedded in a multilayered linear viscoelastic soil deposit with frequency-independent hysteretic material damping subjected to harmonic dynamic lateral loading. It is shown that the analysis can be reduced to model monopiles following the Rayleigh, Euler-Bernoulli, and rigid beam theory. The analysis is verified with well-established solution techniques reported in the literature. Further, the results and the computational time obtained from this analysis are compared with those of the analysis in the first task for four different monopiles with varying slenderness ratio currently installed in the field. The purpose of the comparison is to investigate the applicability of the dynamic analysis for obtaining monopile response which is subjected to cyclic loadings of frequency less than 1.0 Hz. It is found that the static analysis following the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory is sufficient for obtaining monopile response. 
\nIn the third task, the mathematical framework developed in the first task is extended to analyze laterally loaded monopiles modeled as a Euler-Bernoulli beam in a multilayered nonlinear elastic soil deposit and subjected to static loading. In the analysis, the nonlinear elastic relationships describing the variation of shear modulus with shear strain reported in the literature either applicable to undrained clays or sandy soil deposits are utilized. The mathematical accuracy of the analysis is verified by comparing results obtained from the analysis with the results of finite element analysis. A comparison of the computational time between the present and finite element analysis is also shown to demonstrate the computational efficiency of the present analysis. The results of the analysis are further validated with the results of several full-scale field pile-load tests and the p-y analysis procedure available in the literature. The accuracy of the results from this nonlinear elastic approach is further ensured by comparing monopile response with those of finite element simulations where the soil is modeled using an elastic-plastic constitutive model. A comparison of the monopile response is also shown in the p-y analysis to investigate the appropriateness of the currently used p-y curves to analyze and design monopiles. Finally, a preliminary step-by-step design procedure for monopile foundations embedded in nonlinear elastic soil deposit is developed following the recommendations outlined in current codes of practice for offshore wind turbines.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,060
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,988

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationTravaux en français237 207