MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2894585040 · doi:10.1353/esc.2017.0018

Robert Creeley in Transition 1967/1970: Changing Formats for the Public Poetry Reading

2017· article· en· W2894585040 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jason Camlot

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryReading (process)LiteratureTransition (genetics)PresuppositionArtHistoryVisual artsLinguisticsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Robert Creeley in Transition 1967/1970:Changing Formats for the Public Poetry Reading Jason Camlot (bio) How is a poet, stepping up to the podium, affected by the "format of the poetry reading" as a generic event built upon presuppositions of performance? Alternatively, how might a poet affect, resist, or even transform the format of the poetry reading by challenging such presuppositions? The present essay will pursue answers to these questions by focusing on some of the more common features of the poetry reading as it existed in the late 1960s—what I have just called the format of the poetry reading—and the poet Robert Creeley's reflective, artistic relationship to that historically specific format at a key transitional moment in his approach both to writing and performance. Working with the contents of an archive of audio materials that partially documents the Sir George Williams Poetry Series—a sequence of poetry readings that ran in Montreal from 1966 to 1974 and featured over sixty poets from across North America—my essay will listen closely to two recorded readings of Creeley, in particular, for answers, to show how these reading events worked to stage and model the format of the 1960s poetry reading and to present an account of Creeley's resistance to the "standardized and university-accredited poetry reading" at this transitional moment in his career (Lazer 119). [End Page 215] A project that aims to analyze the poetry reading event as a formal literary entity, even the modest, focused version of such a project that this essay represents, would not have been possible twenty years ago in the manner that it is today. We work at a moment of significant transition in literary studies, a moment when core ideas about what comprises the literary archive and the "the literary" itself are in a state of productive expansion and flux. The conception of the archive has broadened beyond traditional models of authorial structure and provenance to be rediscovered as a wide range of actions and entities: as a repertoire of gestures that hold "traumatic flashbacks,… hallucinations" and other "ephemeral and invalid forms of knowledge and evidence" (Taylor 193), as "new genres of expression" in which difficult "feelings are deposited" despite the record's inherent ephemerality (Cvetkovich 1, 7) as conceptual instantiations of "an entire spectrum of broadly conceived collections" (Eichorn 18). Feminist scholars have played a particularly important role in this recalibration of our understanding of the discernibility of accumulations of artifacts and actions in archival terms. Ephemeral traces of artistic and political collective actions and events have accrued new discernibility and meaning as a result of recently developed models of interpretation and theorization and because of a massive migration of materials into digital environments. The literary reading series has become increasingly discernible to us as a potential object of study due to the rise of networked digital media and the associated development of online repositories of literary recordings transferred from an array of analogue sources (Camlot and Wershler). Collections of sound recordings previously held as relatively inaccessible analogue media artifacts within institutional special collections, or just as often in shoeboxes in the basements of community organizations and individuals, are appearing as audible digital artifacts through a variety of interfaces. The readings of Robert Creeley I will discuss are one case in point.1 Their initial instantiation on tape transformed an ephemeral event into a temporal media artifact. The eventual digitization and online presentation of those analogue artifacts has allowed me to consider these events in terms of their temporal scope and detail, thus discerning their larger shape as discrete and related events, and to identify moments as critically significant with time stamps in reference to the digitized media artifact. The media formats, past and present, of the recorded events have afforded new possibilities for providing a critical account of the poetry [End Page 216] reading as it concerned a particular writer during a particular historical period. In telling a story about Creeley and poetry readings, I will be honing in on a specific case study that will serve to illustrate wider possibilities for a critical approach to the poetry reading event as a field of interpretation. Much...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,110
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,218

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0180,023
Communication savante0,0120,009
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetPoetry Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207