Characteristics of Patients Reviewed by a Nurse Practitioner within an Outpatient Palliative Radiation Oncology Clinic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cancer is a highly prevalent illness in Canada, with half of Canadians developing cancer and one quarter dying of the disease. In spite of significant advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatments, many cancers still have a poor prognosis. Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is a common and effective therapy for painful bone metastases. Unfortunately, radiation therapy is only offered at specialized cancer centers throughout Canada, and often treatments can be unplanned, time sensitive, and patients have to travel to receive their treatments. Radiation departments are often overwhelmed with patients needing this vital service, leading to decreased quality of care, increased pain and suffering due to a lack of resources and staff to treat this population on a rapid basis. We hypothesized that the addition of a nurse practitioner (NP) to a PRT clinic would improve the functioning of the clinic by increasing efficiency and accessibility. Objectives To prospectively evaluate symptom burden including patient complexity and severity in palliative oncology patients requiring PRT assessed by an NP or radiation oncologist (RO). Methods Patients (PTS) attending the PRT clinic were randomly assessed by the NP or the RO utilizing history, examination, and validated tools (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS], Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS], Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain [ECS-CP]) to determine eligibility for PRT. Patients assessed by trainees or with missing data were excluded. Data was prospectively entered into an ethics approved database. Results From January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010, 235 patients had a consultation in the PRT clinic. The NP assessed 137 and 98 were assessed by the RO. When compared between the two providers, patient severity (ESAS, KPS) and complexity (ECS-CP, RT) were not significantly different between those assessed by NP compared to RO. Regarding the patients that received radiation, 72/98 PTS (73%) assessed by RO and 108/137 (79%) assessed by NP, when compared were also not statistically significant. The addition of the NP to this clinic allowed the clinic to complete consultations for 58% (137/235) more patients then if the RO was working alone. Conclusion Our study is the first to quantitatively describe the characteristics, symptom severity, and complexity of patient seen by an NP in a PRT clinic. Our results demonstrate that the addition of the NP to this clinic improved the efficiency and accessibility of these services. Our findings warrant replication in other settings to encourage the greater utilization of NP’s in the Canadian health care system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».