Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Clean energy technologies appear to be in the spotlight of recent discussions of policy and opinion makers all around the world. Although these discussions do not always appear very technical, they do provide opportunities to show the way toward scientific and technically sound solutions benefiting all people on the planet. These opportunities are definitely extended toward ASME (which promotes the art, science, and practice of multidisciplinary engineering and allied sciences around the globe) in general and the ASME Nuclear Engineering Division (NED, which focuses on the design, analysis, development, testing, operation and maintenance of reactor systems and components, nuclear fusion, heat transport, nuclear fuels technology, and radioactive waste) in particular. Yes, nuclear energy is a clean energy. Probably, the most abundant of all that is available to humanity today.Research, development, design, commissioning, operation, decommissioning of clean energy technologies including nuclear fission and fusion, and last, but not least, sharing information and experience with peers, are traditionally among the core activities of the members of ASME and its Nuclear Engineering Division. We only need to tackle a few more challenges to seize the opportunities given by the clean energy technologies debate. The main one is offering our advice and expertise to support the policy and opinion makers in their quest for technically sound solutions.The NED already has many appropriate tools for sharing information and experience. The flagship among them is the Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science. After a full four years of steady growth, it is now an established platform for sharing scientific and technical information. This has been made possible through the excellent leadership of the Editor in Chief Prof Igor L. Pioro, the distinguished associate and guest editors, many reviewers, and last but certainly not least, the authors of many high quality contributed papers. We are now very confidently looking forward to the fifth year of growth.Based on the turnout and the comments received from many of the nearly 900 registered participants, the 26th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE 26), held in London, UK, between July 22 and 28, 2018, was a great success. In total, 57% of the participants were from academia, 29% from the industry, and 11% from government. Geographically, the largest part of participants came from China (45%), European Union (20%, including 7% from UK), Japan (16%), USA and Canada (11%), and South Korea (6%). These statistics show emphatically that ICONE presents a truly worldwide view on Nuclear Power, and there is no better venue to express viewpoints or share information with likeminded professionals.The preparations for ICONE 27 are now at the peak. It will be held in Tsukuba, Japan, between May 19 and 24, 2019. Jointly organized by ASME, JSME (Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers), and CNS (Chinese Nuclear Society), it will offer many in-depth technical sessions, the very well-attended student program with 60 student finalists from all continents being invited to the conference, high level plenary sessions, and many panel sessions discussing the latest achievements in technical terms and in the outreach to the public and decision makers. The preparations for ICONE28, scheduled for Aug. 2–6, 2020, and collocated with ASME Power conference in Anaheim, Ca., will start soon.Many NED sponsored activities aim at exchange and cooperation with communities beyond Nuclear Engineering. The 2020 International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management (ICEM; in cooperation with the ASME Environmental Engineering Division), is scheduled for Oct. 4–8, 2020, in Hamburg, Germany. Nuclear Forum has already become a traditional event within the annual International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE). Further initiative, which is gaining traction and support of many ASME divisions, is Advance Clean Energy Summit (ACES), which will reach out to communities beyond Nuclear engineering. The first event is planned in the second half of 2019.The NED is also working on the opportunities to exchange views with the government decision makers. A Congressional Briefing is scheduled for March 2019.I am very grateful to all the NED members, especially the members and past chairs of the Executive Committee, for their brave visions, wisdom, hard work, and loyalty, which all enabled us to be well prepared for the opportunities and challenges confronting us today. Let me also use this opportunity to invite all of you, who would like to contribute more to the activities of NED and through this to contribute also to the success of the nuclear energy among the clean energy technologies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».