MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2895992542 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2018.0030

Crossing Borders between London and Leipzig, between Image and Text: A Case Study of the Illustrirte Zeitung (1843)

2018· article· en· W2895992542 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andreas J. Beck

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanStudioArt historyPublishingHistoryArtEconomic historyVisual artsLiteratureArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Crossing Borders between London and Leipzig, between Image and Text:A Case Study of the Illustrirte Zeitung (1843) Andreas Beck (bio) Crossing borders between states and periodicals was a precondition for the emergence of xylographically illustrated German journals from the 1830s onwards—a precondition, amongst others, for L'Illustration, journal universel (1843–1944) and the Illustrirte Zeitung (1843–1944), the first (and for decades, the only) German counterpart of the Illustrated London News (1842–2003). In the 1830s, Germany had "scarcely any wood-cutters," and the few it had were unable to meet the increasing demand.1 Of necessity, editors thus had to procure xylographic illustrations from abroad,2 especially since German wood engravings were not known for their quality.3 Ten years later, the situation had improved noticeably. Around 1840, a number of English and French wood engravers went to Germany, where they, along with young German craftsmen, established xylographic studios.4 Yet this development only in part removed the former difficulties. Domestic production capacities were still limited, and consequently, the prices asked by wood engravers in Germany were high.5 In the case of larger undertakings, such as the Geschichte Friedrichs des Grossen,6 edited by Johann Jakob Weber, the commissioning of wood engravers abroad still seemed unavoidable, at least until 1842.7 Even if from then on the production of books adorned with plenty of brilliant xylographic illustrations was possible without the assistance of foreign studios, the running of a German counterpart to the Illustrated London News was not. For example, the luxury edition of Musäus's Volksmährchen der Deutschen,8 serialized 1842–43, on average provided about twenty illustrations per month,9 a remarkable increase over the Geschichte Friedrichs (1840–42), where the audience had to be content with fewer than twelve monthly wood engravings.10 [End Page 408] But taking the new production rate as a measure, almost three years would have been necessary to publish the first volume of the Illustrirte Zeitung, whose weekly numbers, containing, it was claimed, "680 … Illustrationen" in all, were issued within only six months between July 1 and December 23, 1843.11 This could only be achieved with support from Britain and France. However, unlike in the case of his Geschichte Friedrichs, Johann Jakob Weber, the editor of the Illustrirte Zeitung, did not commission studios abroad to manufacture engraved wooden printing blocks.12 He decided on a significantly cheaper procedure. Stereotypes, that is to say, type-metal copies of wooden xylographic printing blocks,13 were purchased at a comparatively moderate price in London and Paris and shipped to Leipzig, where illustrations from the Illustrated London News and L'Illustration were reproduced by the Illustrirte Zeitung.14 The emergence of the illustrated news genre in Germany thus resembled that of Penny Magazine-type periodicals ten years earlier. The Pfennig-Magazin (1833–55), initially also conducted by J. J. Weber,15 offered, to a large extent, texts for which the illustrations had also been imported from abroad via stereotypes.16 In the Illustrirte Zeitung, at least in its early phase, we observe the same phenomenon. For example, the first issue of the new journal contains twenty-six illustrations (masthead and vignettes excluded), of which just five had been engraved in Germany; the others were printed from British or French stereotypes.17 This illustration practice did not result in insipid copies of foreign illustrated texts. On the contrary, Germans made a virtue of necessity. The materials from abroad were often skillfully recombined in a way that echoed the early modern artistic technique of imitatio or aemulatio. The inevitable rearrangement of imported pictures and their attendant texts offered the opportunity to develop new relationships between text and image. One mode of interaction, in particular, was promoted by this German copy-and-paste technique. In cases where foreign journals constructed analogies between the pictorial construction of illustrations and the layout structure of the page as a whole, the Illustrirte Zeitung used the opportunity to reinforce the iconic significance of the typeset text. In the following pages, this essay will trace this phenomenon in a number of examples. As my first example shows, the Illustrirte Zeitung ascribes iconic qualities to the typeset text...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,962
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetLiterature and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207