Understanding the Context of Pharmacy Practice Change: Gaining insight into the professional culture of pharmacy and pharmacists’ personality
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Pharmacists around the world are being asked to adopt, and integrate, an increasing number of clinical services into their practices. Evidence for the efficacy of pharmacists’ interventions in patient care also continues to grow. Traditional approaches to understanding practice change have not fully accounted for the environmental context of pharmacy practice. Aim: The aim of this work was to begin this process of understanding the context of pharmacy practice by gaining insight into the professional culture of pharmacy within Canada. Objectives: Objective 1: To gain insight into Canadian pharmacy’s professional culture, using the organizational culture profile (OCP), and personality traits, using the big five inventory (BFI). Objective 2: Investigate possible relationships between pharmacists’ responses to the OCP and BFI and proxy measures of advanced practice. Objective 3: Using demographic data including pharmacy practice setting, pharmacist role, level of education and region of practice to investigate possible sub-group differences in responses provided on the OCP and BFI. Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used in each of the 5 studies included in this work. Participants included Alberta hospital pharmacists (Chapter 2), pharmacists with Additional Prescribing Authority participating in a pharmacy practice research trial (Chapter 3), a national sample of hospital pharmacists (Chapter 4), Alberta pharmacists with Additional Prescribing Authority (Chapter 5), and British Columbia pharmacists (Chapter 6). With the exception of the second study (Chapter 3) all surveys were administered online. A variety of measures, in addition to the OCP and BFI, were collected some examples of included measures include: number of years in practice, level of education, number of patients recruited into a pharmacy practice trial, region of practice, integration of Additional prescribing Authority into practice, and number of prescription adaptations provided each month. The results from each study were first analysed using descriptive statistics, and then using ANOVA analyses, with post-hoc testing, or regression analyses, as appropriate. Conclusions: One OCP factor, competitiveness was consistently repeated across the studies. Results from the BFI also identified one trait, conscientiousness, repeated across each of the 5 studies. A number of significant relationships were observed between the adoption of advanced practice opportunities and the factors of the OCP and the traits of the BFI. Finally, a number of important possible sub-group differences were also identified. Taken together these findings provide insight into the context of pharmacy practice. This improved understanding of context can be used in the development of future knowledge translation intervention studies to advance pharmacists’ practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».