Non-Precious Group Metal Electrocatalysis of Sulfite Electro-Oxidation Reaction for Gold Electrowinning Processes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The electro-oxidation of sulfite and its radicals has a wide range of applications from gold electrowinning to wastewater treatment, hydrogen production and in the food industry (1-4). While efforts have been made to study the electro-oxidation of sulfite ions on noble metals (e.g. Au) as well as carbon surfaces, metal oxides in general have not been thoroughly investigated for this electrochemical reaction (1, 5). During gold recovery from thiosulfate solutions, Au + ions are reduced to Au from the thiosulphate gold complex on the cathode while oxygen evolution occurs on the anode via the following reactions (6): Au(S 2 O 3 ) 2 3- + e - = Au + 2S 2 O 3 -2 , E 0 = 0.15 V (1) 4OH - = 2H 2 O + O 2 + 4e - , E 0 = 0.4 V (2) To drive the cathodic reaction, high current densities are used, which result in high anodic potentials on the stainless-steel anodes. Such high anodic potentials may cause transpassive corrosion of the anode as well as significant, and undesirable, changes in solution chemistry (7). This study systematically investigated the effect of operating factors on the corrosion behavior of stainless steel anodes in thiosulfate solutions during gold electrowinning. Further, novel non-precious group materials such as manganese oxides and perovskites were used as electrocatalysts for sulfite electro-oxidation to ultimately enhance the activity and long-term durability of the anodes in the gold electrowinning process (8). A 2 n half-fraction factorial design study was performed to find the effect of five important parameters involved in the gold electrowinning process (i.e. thiosulfate concentration, sulfite concentration, sulfate concentration, temperature and applied anodic current density), on the anodic potential of the stainless steel anode. As shown in the Fig. 1A, increasing the sulfite concentration and temperature of the gold electrowinning solution lead to a low anodic potential of 550 mV which is about 250 mV lower than the transpassive corrosion potential for the 316 stainless steel anodes. To further reduce the anodic potential and employ the high sulfite concentration (i.e. 3000-32000 ppm) in the gold electrowinning solution, non-precious metal oxides were tested to facilitate the electrowinning process by catalyzing the following sulfite electro-oxidation reaction instead of the oxygen evolution reaction (eq. 2): SO 3 2- + 2OH - = SO 4 2- + H 2 O + 2e - , E 0 = -0.93 V (3) Fig. 1B shows that a combination of manganese oxide and perovskite electrocatalysts provides promising electrocatalytic activity and durability for sulfite electro-oxidation (i.e. up to 500 mV lower onset-potential over 7 hours of testing at 3.5 mAcm -2 ) compared to the Ni, commercial Ag/AgO, Pt, carbon, commercial Pb-2 wt% Ag and stainless steel electrodes tested here. Fig. 1 A) Surface plot produced from the 2 n half-fraction factorial design study on the effect of five electrowinning parameters on the performance of 316 stainless steel gold electrowinning anode. B) A comparison between the electrocatalytic activity of various electrocatalyst materials for sulfite electro-oxidation in a solution of 100 ppm NaCl + 3000 ppm Na 2 SO 4 + 32000 ppm Na 2 SO 3 at 3.5 mA cm -2 and 45 °C. All MnO 2 -based catalysts are under the license with Catalyst Square Materials Ltd (8). References: P. Westbroek, J. De Strycker, K. Van Uytfanghe and E. Temmerman, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry , 516 , 83 (2001). J. A. Allen, G. Rowe, J. T. Hinkley and S. W. Donne, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 39 , 11376 (2014). R. Ojani, J. B. Raoof and A. Alinezhad, Electroanalysis , 14 , 1197 (2002). E. M. Contreras, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 47 , 9709 (2008). A. G. Zelinsky and B. Y. Pirogov, Electrochimica Acta , 231 , 371 (2017). C. Abbruzzese, P. Fornari, R. Massidda, F. Vegliò and S. Ubaldini, Hydrometallurgy , 39 , 265 (1995). N. J. Laycock, R. C. Newman and J. Stewart, Corrosion Science , 37 , 1637 (1995). E. Gyenge and P. Hosseini-Benhangi, An oxygen electrode and a method of manufacturing the same, in, U.S. (15/251,267) and Canadian (2,940,921) patent applications (Filed on August 30, 2016). Figure 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».