Retinopathy Associated with Biallelic Mutations in PYGM (McArdle Disease)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Identification of ocular associations with systemic diseases can aid diagnosis and phenotyping and can yield pathophysiologic insights. McArdle disease (glycogen storage disease type V) is a rare metabolic myopathy (estimated prevalence, 1/100 000) resulting from biallelic mutations in the PYGM gene, encoding muscle glycogen phosphorylase (reviewed by Lucia et al1Lucia A. Nogales-Gadea G. Pérez M. et al.McArdle disease: what do neurologists need to know?.Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008; 4: 568-577Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Patients experience exercise intolerance and risk acute rhabdomyolysis, although life expectancy is rarely affected. A case report from 1988 described pattern dystrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in an affected patient.2Leonardy N.J. Harbin R.L. Sternberg Jr., P. Pattern dystrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium in a patient with McArdle’s disease.Am J Ophthalmol. 1988; 106: 741-742Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar Two further cases have been reported.3Casalino G. Chan W. McAvoy C. et al.Multimodal imaging of posterior ocular involvement in McArdle’s disease.Clin Exp Optom. 2018; 101: 412-415Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar, 4Alsberge J.B. Chen J.J. Zaidi A.A. Fu A.D. Retinal dystrophy in a patient with McArdle disease.Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2018 Aug 1; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1097/ICB.0000000000000790Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar With only 3 cases, chance association is possible; the 2 entities may be unrelated. Pattern dystrophies can be associated with mutations in a number of genes, most frequently PRPH2. We describe here a similar macular appearance in 4 further, unrelated patients with McArdle disease, including findings from multimodal retinal imaging and electrophysiologic examination. Genetic screening was performed, both to confirm PYGM mutations and to check for mutations in a number of known genes implicated in macular or pattern dystrophies. The latter screening showed negative results, suggesting that the 2 entities (retinopathy and McArdle disease) are indeed related. This study had research ethics committee approval. Patient 1, a 64-year-old white man, was referred because of longstanding reduction in right eye vision and an unusual macular appearance. He reported exercise intolerance since childhood and had been diagnosed with McArdle disease after muscle biopsy. Unaided Snellen visual acuity was 20/80 in the right eye (20/60 with pinhole) and 20/20 in the left eye. Over the next 10 years, visual acuity deteriorated in the right eye to counting fingers but remained stable in the left eye. Patient 2, a 63-year-old South Asian man, was referred for reduction in left eye vision over the previous few years. McArdle disease had been diagnosed in late adulthood after muscle biopsy. Visual acuity was 20/17 in the right eye and 20/60 in the left eye; 4 years later, visual acuity was 20/20 and 20/80, respectively. Patient 3, a 56-year-old white man, was noted previously to have an abnormal retinal appearance by his optometrist. He had been diagnosed with McArdle disease (molecularly confirmed) 2 years before review in our service. He was visually asymptomatic; visual acuity was 20/17 in each eye. Patient 4, a 68-year-old white man, was referred to his local hospital eye service after his optometrist noted an abnormal retinal appearance. He had no visual problems other than refractive error. He had been diagnosed by his local ophthalmology service, based on the macular appearance, with Stargardt disease. McArdle disease had been diagnosed after muscle biopsy in his 30s, although he reported fatigue since childhood. Visual acuity was 20/40 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. Figure 1 depicts the appearance of the fundus on color photography and autofluorescence, the latter showing distinctive reticular areas of stippled hyperautofluorescence. Spectral-domain OCT (Fig S1, available at www.aaojournal.org) confirmed abnormalities at the level of the RPE, outer retina, or both. Ultra-widefield autofluorescence imaging showed abnormalities in the far peripheral retina also, particularly nasally (Fig S2, available at www.aaojournal.org). Patients 1, 2, and 4 underwent electroretinography recording according to international standards. All demonstrated normal full-field electroretinography results; pattern electroretinograms were undetectable in patient 1 and within normal limits in patients 2 and 4. Patients 1 and 2 also underwent electro-oculography, which showed a normal light rise. Patients 1 and 2 underwent Sanger sequencing of all coding exons and exon-intron boundaries of PRPH2, thought to be the most likely genetic cause of such a fundus appearance (Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, United Kingdom). No pathogenic variants were found. All patients underwent screening for disease-causing mutations in a number of additional genes implicated in macular or pattern dystrophies: ABCA4, BEST1, CDH3, EFEMP1, ELOVL4, IMPG1, IMPG2, PROM1, PRPH2, TIMP3; Molecular Vision Laboratory, Hillsboro, Oregon). For patients 2, 3, and 4, the panel also included DRAM2, RP1L1, and TTLL5. Results were negative. Screening of PYGM (Sheffield Diagnostic Genetics Service, Sheffield, United Kingdom) molecularly confirmed McArdle disease in all patients. Patient 1 was homozygous for the frequently reported nonsense mutation p.(Arg50*). Patient 2 harbored the novel homozygous stop mutation p.(Gln176*). Patients 3 and 4 were compound heterozygotes: patient 3, p.(Arg50*) and p.(Gly205Ser); patient 4, p.(Arg94Trp) and p.(Gly695Arg). In all patients, diagnosis of McArdle disease preceded detection of retinal abnormalities (apart from patient 3). Patients 1 and 2 were referred to the ophthalmology service because of visual symptoms; patients 3 and 4 were visually asymptomatic, but an optometrist detected an abnormal fundal appearance. Genetic testing for macular or pattern dystrophy genes was initiated by our service, and genetic confirmation of McArdle disease also was obtained after review in our service (except in patient 3). This article reports multimodal imaging findings of a distinctive retinopathy in 4 unrelated patients with McArdle disease, similar to the previous case reports. We also report results of retinal electrophysiologic analysis: despite far peripheral abnormalities on ultrawide-field imaging, there was no definite electrophysiologic evidence of generalized retinal, or generalized RPE, dysfunction (full-field electroretinography and electro-oculography light rise results were normal). Screening results for mutations in a number of macular dystrophy genes were negative. In particular, the findings could not be attributed to mutations in PRPH2, which would have been most likely to result in a similar retinal phenotype. Patient 4 had been diagnosed previously with Stargardt disease, but genetic testing yielded no mutations in ABCA4. The results of this study are of clinical significance because they support the association of this retinopathy with McArdle disease and can reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis; this is increasingly important because particular genetic causes of retinopathy (including ABCA4) are subject to a number of novel treatment trials. Why might muscle glycogen phosphorylase deficiency affect the retina? The enzyme catalyses conversion of glycogen to glucose-1-phosphate in skeletal muscle. Liver, muscle, and brain have different isoforms of the enzyme. In human RPE, glycogen is present, and both muscle and brain isoenzymes have been demonstrated. Intracellular glycogen is likely to act as a buffer5Senanayake P. Calabro A. Hu J.G. et al.Glucose utilization by the retinal pigment epithelium: evidence for rapid uptake and storage in glycogen, followed by glycogen utilization.Exp Eye Res. 2006; 83: 235-246Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar in glucose delivery from choroid to photoreceptors via the RPE. It is possible that deficiency of a glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme may disturb this process, leading to degeneration. This is one hypothesis; other mechanisms are possible, and further work is needed. The authors thank Priya Francome-Wood, Moorfields Eye Hospital, and Andrew Wakelin, Association for Glycogen Storage Disease UK. Download .pdf (.89 MB) Help with pdf files Figure S1 Download .pdf (.79 MB) Help with pdf files Figure S2
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».