Student Activities in Victoria, ASLO Summer Meeting 2018
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This June ASLO held the 2018 Summer Meeting in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Student participation made up 34% of the meeting with 335 total registered attendees. ASLO awarded 65 travel grants to students attending the meeting; of the 261 applicants, we were able to fund 25%. Also, for the first time, ASLO provided travel grants to 10 students from developing countries to attend the meeting. There were numerous lunchtime workshops and activities geared toward students at the meeting. On Sunday evening after the opening plenary, the students met together for an opening pub crawl. We ventured to downtown Victoria and connected over beer and science while supporting local breweries. This was an opportunity for the students to meet up and get connected in a nonscientific setting. On Monday, the Student Board Members hosted a networking mixer with food and drinks for student attendees. Senior scientists came to the mixer and were given drink tickets to hand out to get students to give their 1-min elevator pitch. Of course, the tickets eased the conversation, but by the end of the night, the students and scientists were still chatting long after the event was over! On Tuesday, the first lunchtime workshop entitled “Publish Me Please” addressed major publishing concerns most graduate students come across. The panel comprised Pat Soranno (Editor in Chief, L&O Letters), Paul Kemp (Editor in Chief, L&O Methods) Stephanie Hampton (Associate Editor, L&O), Paul Montagna (Editor in Chief, Estuaries and Coasts), and John Downing (Associate Editor, L&O). The panelists discussed their top tips on publishing papers, and how to avoid harsh reviewer comments. The session started with prepared questions but ended with students shouting out numerous questions and thoughts on their fears of publishing. The room was packed tight with over 100 students present! The final lunchtime workshop, entitled “How to ASK so you SHALL receive?” was held on Thursday. Over 150 students sat listening attentively as a panel had a real talk discussion on salary and negotiations. The workshop started off slowly as the students really wondered if they could ask about salaries. The panelists: Amina Pollard (Ecologist, US EPA), Jim Elser (Professor, U of Montana & Director Flathead Lake Biological Station), Grace Wilkinson (Assistant Professor, Iowa State), and Jennifer Cherrier (Professor & Chair Brooklyn College of the City University of New York) quickly jumped in with an icebreaker on their first attempt at negotiations, and how they have as learned better. The students loosened up and we ran out of time trying to answer all the questions. The summer meeting usually has a smaller attendance, which makes for a more intimate setting with students and senior scientists. The opening pub crawl allowed students to meet on the first day and led to more connections throughout the week. All the workshops and activities received great feedback, and we hope to repeat these at future meetings! If you have suggestions for future workshop topics or would like to be involved, we want to hear from you! We look forward to seeing all of you again at our next Aquatic Sciences meeting in San Juan, Puerto Rico!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».