MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2898491562 · doi:10.1109/icde.2018.00271

Enhancing Binary Classification by Modeling Uncertain Boundary in Three-Way Decisions (Extended Abstract)

2018· article· en· W2898491562 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueText and Document Classification Technologies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Regina
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceScalabilityClass (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)Boundary (topology)Artificial intelligenceBinary classificationMachine learningTraining setSubject (documents)Information retrievalSupport vector machineWorld Wide WebDatabaseMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Text classification techniques are playing a crucial role in identifying relevant texts from a large data set, e.g., various online crimes such as Cyberbullying, terrorist recruiting, propaganda or attack planning. Until now, supervised deep learning has brought about breakthroughs in processing multimedia data; however, there was no good practical way to harvest this opportunity for text classification because acquiring and maintaining a massive amount of training examples are too expensive for a large number of categories (e.g., Yahoo! taxonomy contains nearly 300,000 categories and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) contains 394,070 subjects). Therefore, the question of how to effectively learn from sparse or small set of training examples is crucial for the true success of text classification. Semi-supervised approaches have been proposed for this challenge, which usually use a pair or several existing classifiers to extend a small training set. However, extracted pseudo training samples are uncertain because they are determined by a machine rather than people. Also, the massive volume and high variability of text data are creating a number of challenging issues such as the scalability and complicated relations between words. There are two fundamental issues with regards to the performance of existing classifiers: overlook and overload. Overlook means that some objects relevant to a class have been omitted, whereas overload means that some objects assigned to a class are actually not relevant to that class. The two issues are even more serious in the following two cases: (1) large uncertain boundary - the decision boundary between two classes includes many mixed examples (e.g., relevant and nonrelevant documents together), and (2) unbalanced classes - one class (e.g., information about terrorist attacks) is much smaller than another class (e.g., normal descriptions). We propose a three-way decision model [1] for dealing with the uncertain boundary for improving text classification performance based on rough set techniques and centroid solution. It aims to understand the uncertain boundary through partitioning the training samples into three regions (the positive, boundary and negative regions) by two main boundary vectors created from the labeled positive and negative training subsets, respectively, and further resolve the objects in the boundary region by two derived boundary vectors produced according to the structure of the boundary region. Four decision rules are proposed from the training process and applied to the incoming documents for more precise classification. The experimental results on the standard data sets RCV1 and Reuters-21578 show that the usage of boundary vectors is very effective and efficient for dealing with uncertainties of the decision boundary, and the proposed model has significantly improved the performance of binary text classification in terms of F1 measure and AUC area compared with six other popular baseline models.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,863
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,600

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle