Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The primary objective of the study was to determine why established females tolerate new females that join their breeding group and lay eggs in their nest. Previous work on this population has shown that females suffer a cost of joint-nesting in the form of lowered hatching success. Therefore, we would expect female pukeko to attempt to disrupt the reproductive efforts of their co-nesters by ejecting their eggs from the joint nest. Two hypotheses might explain why this does not happen. The "peace incentive" hypothesis states that females would forego egg destruction to avoid retaliatory behaviour by the other female. Alternatively, females might not destroy the eggs of co-nesters because they cannot discriminate between their own and another female's eggs. To test between these, we experimentally removed the eggs of one of the females from a number of joint nests. In all S(Wen cases for which we have data on the post-removal behaviour of the females, the robbed female showed no response to the disappearance of her eggs and continued to incubate the clutch. In addition, we added eggs to eight single female nests. Again, the single females showed no sign that they could distinguish between the foreign eggs and their own. The foreign eggs were not buried, ejected, or destroyed, nor were they moved preferentially to the outer perimeter of the clutch. To perform the egg removal experiments, I needed to correctly group joint clutches of eggs into maternal sib-groups. I evaluated two methods of doing this, one relying on qualitative observer assessment and the other on statistical techniques. I determined genetic maternity using DNA fingerprinting. Qualitative assessment was more effective than statistical techniques for identifying the maternity of eggs. Such an approach may be a useful alternative to expensive and time-consuming molecular genetic techniques for measuring reproductive skew in joint-nesting birds. Predation rates on pukeko nests at our study site during the 1998/99 nesting season were significantly higher than they had been in previous years (1990-1995). In the intervening years, the local rabbit population crashed as the result of two rabbit control measures: poisoning and rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD). We hypothesised that the increase in predation rates was due to rabbit specialist predators seeking out alternative prey after the crash in rabbit populations. Such a scenario is of grave concern to wildlife managers in many areas of New Zealand where rabbits are abundant and threatened native bird species are already under extreme pressure from introduced predators.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,033 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».