MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2899482430 · doi:10.1080/03610470.2018.1492818

Comparisons of Modern United States and Canadian Malting Barley Cultivars with Those from Pre-Prohibition: IV. Malting Quality Assessments Using Standard and Nonstandard Measures

2018· article· en· W2899482430 sur OpenAlex
Cynthia A. Henson, Stanley H. Duke, Harold E. Bockelman

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNursing
ThématiqueFood composition and properties
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAmerican Malting Barley AssociationU.S. Department of Agriculture
Mots-clésMaltotrioseMashingMaltoseAmylaseAlpha-amylasePopulationFood scienceStarchCultivarBrewingBiologyChemistryBotanyBiochemistryEnzymeSucroseFermentation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This study was conducted to identify which traits or combination of traits associated with malting quality and mashing performance could best define the differences between and within a population of six pre-Prohibition malting barley varieties and a population of five modern elite malting barley cultivars. To accomplish this, standard and nonstandard metrics of malt quality and of performance during Congress mashing were analyzed by simple linear correlations and multivariate statistics. Analyses of the two populations combined revealed that activities of α-amylase at each time sampled during mashing were positively and significantly correlated with the concentrations of glucose at that same time, were not significantly correlated with maltose concentrations at any time, and were only significantly correlated with maltotriose concentrations for the first 30 min of mashing. Activities of β-amylase were not significantly correlated with concentrations of glucose, maltose, or maltotriose at any time during mashing. Analysis of α-glucosidase activities showed no consistent trends in correlations with either glucose or maltotriose and no significant correlation with maltose at any time. Analysis of limit dextrinase activities showed significant and positive correlations with glucose and maltotriose concentrations prior to the mash temperature reaching the starch conversion stage. Although no individual amylolytic enzyme activity was significantly correlated with maltose concentration, diastatic power was positively and significantly correlated with maltose at five of six times sampled during mashing. Diastatic power was not significantly correlated with glucose or maltotriose concentrations at any time. Malt extract values and osmolyte concentrations were positively and significantly correlated with mash glucose concentrations at all times sampled, with maltose concentrations at the first four times sampled, and with maltotriose for the first five times. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the traits analyzed in the two populations combined showed that the modern malting barleys were generally well separated from the pre-Prohibition barleys by three principal components that accounted for 75% of the variation among the 11 cultivars. The traits that collectively contributed the most to separation of the modern from the pre-Prohibition barleys were osmolyte concentrations, malt extract values and glucose concentration, which were higher in the modern cultivars, and α-glucosidase thermostability and concentrations of maltopentaose, maltohexaose and maltoheptaose, which were higher in the pre-Prohibition cultivars. PCA of the individual populations also separated Tradition from the other modern cultivars due to its lower levels of glucose, maltotriose, and α-amylase activity and by its higher levels of maltose and % plump. PCA of the pre-Prohibition population separated Hanna from the other pre-Prohibition cultivars primarily by its higher levels of maltopentaose through maltoheptaose and its low levels of osmolytes. Silver King was somewhat displaced from other pre-Prohibition cultivars due to its low levels of osmolytes and to its very high levels of α-glucosidase thermostability.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,983

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle