MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W290081359

Outcomes for Community Partners in an Unmediated Service-Learning Program

2003· article· en· W290081359 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ethel Jorge

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueService-Learning and Community Engagement
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeneral partnershipImmigrationCurriculumPopulationService (business)Public relationsMedical educationGerontologyPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyMedicinePedagogyBusinessDemographyMarketing
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Program Overview In summer 2000 Pitzer College implemented a Spanish language program connecting the classroom with a community of native speakers in Ontario, California, a city of 163,000 east of Los Angeles with a rapidly growing Latino population. The development of this partnership had started in September 1999 when a student assistant, rooted in the cultures of the area, and I began to search for the right community setting for the program. I interviewed many residents of several Ontario neighborhoods as potential promotoras (female heads of households who were to assist us by acting as promoters of Spanish language and culture) and met with staff members of several community organizations. In April 2000--for a number of reasons including deep interest in the program, exclusive use of Spanish in the household, and strong family life--we selected promotoras from the pool of parents who were active in a primary school located in a 3.5 square mile area known as the Sultana Corridor. We proceeded to design the program's operation and curriculum with the help of this group of individuals who were not represented by, and did not represent any, official community organization. A program based on direct interaction with individuals rather than mediated by a social service organization has had both advantages and disadvantages, many of which will be touched on in this article. Hosted by a promotora, students are received into the homes of immigrant Mexican families for discussion, community exploration, and participation in family activities. During the academic year, this experience is offered as a practicum for 30 students per semester, and with the exception of beginning students, it accommodates various levels of proficiency. Many students enroll concurrently in an appropriate formal language class. In the summer, 15-20 students participate in intensive eight-week formal classes at both beginning and intermediate levels. They engage in formal two-hour visits twice a week during the summer and once a week during the academic year. Informally, they often extend visits or engage in ancillary activities with their families on other days. They visit in groups of three, usually traveling together from campus, thus using the travel time for discussions in Spanish. Half of the students enroll in the class for a second semester, generally visiting the same family, and some have even kept up this contact after graduation. The initial group of promotoras continued to participate through the three years of the program until summer 2003 when two of the six moved to other neighborhoods and one lost interest. The remaining group has recommended other neighbors to take places. Some promotoras work out better than others because of personalities, values, motivation, and the benefits they feel they receive from the partnership. There seems to be a cycle of engagement that depends on continuing interest, participation in other activities, the importance of the stipend for the household, benefits for children, and life changes. The promotoras that have kept working for the entire three years have found new ways to benefit from contacts with the college. Some who have left temporarily have nevertheless maintained loose connections with the faculty and the other promotoras, for whom they sometimes act as substitutes. In the beginning, because of the collaborative process for designing the program structure and curriculum, faculty met with the promotoras often, but now do so only as needed. However, with the help of continuing students, we provide an extensive orientation for all new students at the beginning of every class. Most of the students are very satisfied with experiences, but each semester approximately 10% are somewhat dissatisfied. The reasons are varied and complex, some relating to personality clashes, or the inability to be active learners or take risks. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,327 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations35
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of the Abraham Lincoln AssociationMême sujetService-Learning and Community EngagementTravaux en français237 207