MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2901035702 · doi:10.1353/soh.2018.0313

Cities as Multiple Landscapes: Investigating the Sister Cities Innsbruck and New Orleans ed. by Christina Antenhofer et al.

2018· article· en· W2901035702 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hedwig Richter

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Southern History · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeological Research and Protection
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSisterArt historyHistorySociologyGeographyAnthropology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Cities as Multiple Landscapes: Investigating the Sister Cities Innsbruck and New Orleansed. by Christina Antenhofer et al. Hedwig Richter Cities as Multiple Landscapes: Investigating the Sister Cities Innsbruck and New Orleans. Edited by Christina Antenhofer, Günter Bischof, Robert Dupont, and Ulrich Leitner. Interdisciplinary Urban Research. (Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag, 2016. Pp. 529. $68.00, ISBN 978-3-593-50647-0.) At the very beginning of this book, the editors ask the question: "How should it be possible to compare two such different cities as Innsbruck and New Orleans?" (p. 11). It is with these two cities—the Austrian alpine city and the southern U.S. port city—that the volume, consisting of five hundred pages and twenty-five articles, is concerned. But of course the important question is not how to compare something—since anything can be compared. Rather, it is whether it is worth making a comparison in the first place. And this crucial question is also one that the editors pose with disarming candor in their introduction: "why should one even want to compare these cities which at first glance do not have much in common?" (p. 11). As the editors reveal, the immediate impetus for the volume came from an International Summer School that the University of New Orleans has hosted in [End Page 1051]Innsbruck since 1976. Since then, 10,000 students, 454 professors, and 62 staff members have each spent six weeks in idyllic Innsbruck. But what is interesting about the book? Why is it worth comparing the two cities? Some of the contributors do indeed refer to the concept of "Multiple Landscapes" that appears in the book's title, with this idea serving (as the editors write in their introduction) "as a heuristic concept to organize the approaches to the multiple layers and unique logic of each of the two cities alike" (p. 19). The question may immediately arise as to whether there are also non-multiple landscapes, but it sounds good in any case. It is in this spirit that we should understand the historians, tourism experts, city planners, architects, geographers, and educationalists who fill the volume with their studies and who for the most part work at the University of Innsbruck and, to a lesser extent, at the University of New Orleans and other universities. Largely unburdened by research questions and released from any coherence that might unite the volume, the contributors tell of interesting events, places worth seeing, and curious insights, of facts worth knowing, and of all sorts of other things. The geographer Richard Campanella, for example, reports on a unique treasure in New Orleans: the Notarial Archives, which contains more than 40 million pages of property transfer records spanning three centuries. The French Quarter, popular with tourists, is particularly well documented. Campanella also wonders why the narrow houses known as "shotguns" boomed after the Civil War. And we learn that this trend might well have had something to do with the end of slavery: since only a few households could still afford servants, there was no longer the need for extra space for staff in the houses. In turn, city planner Arnold Klotz and historian Wolfgang Meixner report in a chapter about "Innsbruck as Olympic City" that Innsbruck has twice hosted the largest sports event in the world after the FIFA World Cup. Their article contains impressive photographs of the architecture that these major events have left behind. That Innsbruck was hit heavily by the Allies in twenty-two bombing raids in 1944 is a fact that even many German speakers may not know—but one that we can read about in this volume. Not a few of the insights presented are actually quite obvious: that large cities are less influenced by their universities than are smaller cities, or that the changes in Innsbruck over the last few decades are "to be traced back onto a solid historical foundation" (p. 167). And, while we are on the subject of cities and universities, one author bravely compares the cities of New York, Chicago, and Montreal. Speaking of universities: one academic explains in a very detailed way that universities have the unpleasant effect of making...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,036
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,121

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0130,010
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Southern HistoryMême sujetArchaeological Research and ProtectionTravaux en français237 207