Cities as Multiple Landscapes: Investigating the Sister Cities Innsbruck and New Orleans ed. by Christina Antenhofer et al.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Cities as Multiple Landscapes: Investigating the Sister Cities Innsbruck and New Orleansed. by Christina Antenhofer et al. Hedwig Richter Cities as Multiple Landscapes: Investigating the Sister Cities Innsbruck and New Orleans. Edited by Christina Antenhofer, Günter Bischof, Robert Dupont, and Ulrich Leitner. Interdisciplinary Urban Research. (Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag, 2016. Pp. 529. $68.00, ISBN 978-3-593-50647-0.) At the very beginning of this book, the editors ask the question: "How should it be possible to compare two such different cities as Innsbruck and New Orleans?" (p. 11). It is with these two cities—the Austrian alpine city and the southern U.S. port city—that the volume, consisting of five hundred pages and twenty-five articles, is concerned. But of course the important question is not how to compare something—since anything can be compared. Rather, it is whether it is worth making a comparison in the first place. And this crucial question is also one that the editors pose with disarming candor in their introduction: "why should one even want to compare these cities which at first glance do not have much in common?" (p. 11). As the editors reveal, the immediate impetus for the volume came from an International Summer School that the University of New Orleans has hosted in [End Page 1051]Innsbruck since 1976. Since then, 10,000 students, 454 professors, and 62 staff members have each spent six weeks in idyllic Innsbruck. But what is interesting about the book? Why is it worth comparing the two cities? Some of the contributors do indeed refer to the concept of "Multiple Landscapes" that appears in the book's title, with this idea serving (as the editors write in their introduction) "as a heuristic concept to organize the approaches to the multiple layers and unique logic of each of the two cities alike" (p. 19). The question may immediately arise as to whether there are also non-multiple landscapes, but it sounds good in any case. It is in this spirit that we should understand the historians, tourism experts, city planners, architects, geographers, and educationalists who fill the volume with their studies and who for the most part work at the University of Innsbruck and, to a lesser extent, at the University of New Orleans and other universities. Largely unburdened by research questions and released from any coherence that might unite the volume, the contributors tell of interesting events, places worth seeing, and curious insights, of facts worth knowing, and of all sorts of other things. The geographer Richard Campanella, for example, reports on a unique treasure in New Orleans: the Notarial Archives, which contains more than 40 million pages of property transfer records spanning three centuries. The French Quarter, popular with tourists, is particularly well documented. Campanella also wonders why the narrow houses known as "shotguns" boomed after the Civil War. And we learn that this trend might well have had something to do with the end of slavery: since only a few households could still afford servants, there was no longer the need for extra space for staff in the houses. In turn, city planner Arnold Klotz and historian Wolfgang Meixner report in a chapter about "Innsbruck as Olympic City" that Innsbruck has twice hosted the largest sports event in the world after the FIFA World Cup. Their article contains impressive photographs of the architecture that these major events have left behind. That Innsbruck was hit heavily by the Allies in twenty-two bombing raids in 1944 is a fact that even many German speakers may not know—but one that we can read about in this volume. Not a few of the insights presented are actually quite obvious: that large cities are less influenced by their universities than are smaller cities, or that the changes in Innsbruck over the last few decades are "to be traced back onto a solid historical foundation" (p. 167). And, while we are on the subject of cities and universities, one author bravely compares the cities of New York, Chicago, and Montreal. Speaking of universities: one academic explains in a very detailed way that universities have the unpleasant effect of making...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».