MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2901076366 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-109906

Fetal-Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia (FNAIT): Guidance to Reduce the Risk of Intracranial Bleeding

2018· article· en· W2901076366 sur OpenAlexaff
Lani Lieberman, Andreas Greinacher, Michael Murphy, Tamam Bakchoul, Stacy Corke, Susano Tanael, Mette Kjær, Jens Kjeldsen‐Kragh, Gérald Bertrand, Dick Oepkes, Jillian M. Baker, Heather Hume, Edwin Massey, James B. Bussel, Cécile Kaplan, Donald M. Arnold, Shoma Baidya, Greg Ryan, Helen Savoia, Denise Landry, Nadine Shehata

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalMcMaster UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Michael's HospitalMount Sinai HospitalCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineNeonatal alloimmune thrombocytopeniaObstetricsNeonatologySystematic reviewMEDLINEPediatricsPregnancyIntensive care medicineFetus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction FNAIT is associated with severe bleeding, especially intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), in the fetus and/or newborn. More than 75% of ICHs occur in utero and up to 50% before 32 weeks gestation. The consequences of ICH include death (35%) or serious neurological sequelae in survivors (83%). FNAIT requires prompt identification and treatment antepartum, postpartum and in subsequent pregnancies. An international panel was convened by the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines (ICTMG) to develop evidence based recommendations for diagnosis and management of FNAIT. Methods The international panel consisted of specialists in adult and pediatric hematology, maternal fetal medicine (MFM), neonatology, methodology, transfusion medicine, and a patient representative. Clinical questions were developed for diagnostic testing, antenatal screening and management, and postnatal interventions. A systematic search for articles published between 1946 and June 2017 in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane was conducted. Recommendations were formulated based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method which incorporates the quality of the evidence, benefits and risks, and resource utilization. Web conferences and electronic correspondence were used to discuss the results of the systematic reviews and formulate recommendations. Considerations for clinical practice such as dosing of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and corticosteroids were detailed. Electronic surveys were sent to all members to assess agreement with recommendations. The final guidance document was sent to maternal fetal, hematology and pediatric societies for comments. Results Three systematic reviews (antenatal management, postnatal management and use of laboratory investigations to identify pregnancies at risk) were developed. Antenatal recommendations: Women with FNAIT in a previous pregnancy or sisters of women with FNAIT should be referred to MFM centers. Fetal HPA typing (e.g. HPA-1a/1b) should be performed in HPA-immunized pregnant women when the paternity is unknown or the partner is heterozygous or unavailable for testing. Prenatal HPA-1 typing should preferentially be performed by a non-invasive method e.g. cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal plasma if adequately quality assured. Antenatal IVIG administration to the mother commencing at 12-16 weeks gestation should be offered to all women in a subsequent pregnancy with maternal fetal incompatibility who have had a previous fetus or neonate with FNAIT related ICH. For all other pregnancies with a previous neonate with FNAIT (without ICH), administering antenatal IVIG to the mother should be discussed prior to a subsequent pregnancy or when pregnancy with maternal fetal incompatibility is confirmed. If corticosteroids are used with IVIG, dexamethasone should not be used because of the associated risk of oligohydramnios. Postnatal recommendations: HPA-selected platelets should be made available at delivery for potentially affected infants to increase the neonatal platelet count. If HPA-selected platelets are not immediately available, unselected platelets should be used. In the presence of life-threatening neonatal hemorrhage such as intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding, platelets should be transfused to maintain platelet counts above 50 to 100x109/L for at least 7 days. In the absence of life-threatening bleeding in a neonate such as intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding, platelets should be transfused to maintain a platelet count above 30x109/L. Conclusions The intent of this guidance document developed from systematic reviews is to promote best practices in the management of FNAIT. The guideline development group developed algorithms for treatment, podcasts for physicians and patients, pamphlets for patients and a slide set to assist with the implementation of recommendations into practice. This expert panel identified key areas for future research. One is the optimal approach to antenatal management of the next affected pregnancy. Developing biomarkers of fetal severity would be critical to this endeavor. In addition, creating comprehensive screening to identify HPA-1b1b women at risk of FNAIT would advance successful prevention of this disease. Disclosures Bakchoul: German Research Society (DFG): Research Funding; Aspen Germany gGmbH, CLS Behring, Stago gGmbH: Honoraria; Robert Bosch gGmbH: Research Funding. Kjaer:Prophylix Pharma: Equity Ownership. Kjeldsen-Kragh:Prophylix Pharma: Equity Ownership. Oepkes:Towards routine HPA screening in pregnancy: Research Funding. Bussel:Uptodate: Honoraria; Rigel: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protalex: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prophylix: Consultancy, Research Funding; Momenta: Consultancy. Arnold:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Savoia:Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia Registry of the Transfusion Outcomes Research Collaborative (TORC) Australia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,085

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,058
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,005
Bibliométrie0,0090,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207