Notice bibliographique
Résumé
EDITORIAL EDITORIAL “a pack of cards” O ne d a y in Ja n u a r y 2000, I spent part of a “golden afternoon” wandering through “All the golden afternoon: the inventions of Lewis Carroll,” the exhibition selected from the Joseph Brabant Collection of “Alice” material that was shown at the Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library at the University of Toronto. Somehow, the image of Alice with the “pack of cards ... flying down upon her” reminded me of the life of an editor of a periodical as s/he is chased by, and chases, mate rial that needs sorting out and that tumbles down in often confusing patterns. I have especially felt this way recently as I have tried to or ganize this special millennium issue on the past, present, and future of English studies in Canada, public policy, and the public good, and to answer myself some of the questions posed by the contributors. There are, I suspect, no easy solutions to the challenges faced by English studies, and there is no reason why there should be. Heather Murray’s checklist of writings on English studies in Canada in the last decade, however, grounds the two articles, the two pieces in the read ers’ forum, and the eight reviews that follow. Thus, while it is not usual to privilege systematic bibliography in this way, I have done it deliberately to suggest that there are historical contexts for the discussion of our present and future. The interrogations of our profes sion by Len Findlay, Mervyn Nicholson, Laura Robinson, and Sharon Hamilton are remarkable, it seems to me, both for their courageous — some might say reckless — stances and their provocative invitations to throw up the cards of English studies and to analyse in fresh ways how they land. We are not the only discipline, of course, undergoing a process of self-examination and attempting to achieve new insights by writ ing “outside the box,” to use a current expression. The first review, which focusses chiefly on the university past, and the last, which looks mostly on the university present and future, frame the other six so that they may be read both in the context of the university at large and the academic enterprise in general. Although these half-dozen reviews have Canadian literature as their chief subject matter, they deal with books that themselves reveal many different approaches in the scholarship and criticism of English studies in Canada. The readers of English Studies in Canada, not the writers and the organizer of its material, will finally have to judge the success of this special issue. But if it stimulates more thought and elicits more 249 EDITORIAL discussion on our profession, its place in Canada, and our place in a North American environment, then throwing up the cards, even though they fly wildly around, will have been worth the editor’s oc casional “little scream.” Mary Jane Edwards Editor, ESC 250 ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».