MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2901876134 · doi:10.1353/nin.2016.0026

Spirit of ’67: The Cardiac Kids, El Birdos, and the World Series That Captivated America by Thomas J. Whalen

2016· article· en· W2901876134 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Hensler

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsHistoryLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Spirit of ’67: The Cardiac Kids, El Birdos, and the World Series That Captivated America by Thomas J. Whalen Paul Hensler Thomas J. Whalen. Spirit of ’67: The Cardiac Kids, El Birdos, and the World Series That Captivated America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little-field, 2017. 300 pp. Cloth, $35.00. For those old enough to have lived through—indeed, survived—the rush of events across the broad spectrum of United States history during the late 1960s, a look back at that heady era can afford a nostalgic stroll (from a safe distance of fifty years on) or an opening of old wounds perhaps best left in the past. In the escapist world of the national pastime, fans—especially Baby Boomers—should take a fair degree of delight in Thomas J. Whalen’s breezy account of the combatants in the 1967 World Series. In Spirit of ’67, he explores that year’s two premier teams, the Boston Red Sox and St. Louis Cardinals, on a granular level. Such detail, however, serves to both inform and frustrate, depending on the reader’s level of knowledge of these two franchises. Appropriately, Whalen does well to set the tone of the age by opening the book with an overview of the political and cultural landscape in 1967 America, even though his labelling of this year as “an annus horribilis” overreaches in light of what transpired in 1968 (1). Nonetheless, the civil rights struggle, President Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” program, and the burgeoning Vietnam War all forged ahead, accompanied by a psychedelically infused soundtrack as the generation gap and the war’s credibility gap began to exacerbate deepening divides across the country. As the author segues to the world of sports, baseball and the stiff competition it faced from the rise in popularity of professional football come into focus. Whalen postulates that one downside of baseball was that “games took longer to complete”—the average game time throughout the 1960s was just over two- and- one-half hours—yet indeed “fans grew restless and bored” because offensive output was on the wane as 1968’s “year of the pitcher” was about to descend on the national pastime (15). But to the delight of many fans, especially American League supporters, a reprieve from boredom was furnished courtesy of a thrilling four-team pennant race in the AL. [End Page 224] At this point, the storyline moves to a series of chapters that follow the history of the Cardinal and Red Sox franchises through the 1967 World Series, with a concluding essay on what became of some of the book’s central characters in the aftermath of the Fall Classic. This approach will appeal to those unfamiliar with the men who featured prominently to put Boston and St. Louis in the forefront, and the retelling of these stories is helpful to a degree. In a cultural sense, the narrative notes the racial integration problems inherent in the front office decisions that affected the roster of the Red Sox as well as other indignities suffered by several African American Cardinals. Desegregation and the fight against Jim Crow certainly were among the most inflammatory topics of the Sixties, and baseball was not immune to this societal transition. However, the diversion into so many other background details detracts from the premise of 1967 that the title of the book more than implies. For example, detours are taken to briefly explore Bill Veeck and the Eddie Gaedel episode, and nearly four pages are devoted to the early history of the Red Sox before finally introducing Tom Yawkey as the new team owner. In explaining how key players found their way to their respective clubs, some of the profiles are too lengthy, as in the case of veteran outfielder Roger Maris. Granted, the former Yankee was truly a valuable addition to the Cardinal lineup, yet his mini-biography commands eight full pages, which includes the well-worn controversy over his home-run record chase of 1961. Carl Yastrzemski, George Scott, Ken Harrelson, Lou Brock, Orlando Cepeda, Tim McCarver, and other notables are scattered throughout, and the tragic misfortune of Tony Conigliaro does receive the attention it is due. But...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,065
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,219

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0650,023

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,195
Écart entre enseignants0,187 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207