Dan Rodriguez-Garcia. Managing Immigration and Diversity in Canada: A Transatlantic Dialogue in the New Age of Migration
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dan Rodriguez-Garcia. Managing Immigration and Diversity in Canada: A Transatlantic Dialogue in the New Age of Migration. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2012. 405 pp. $39.95 sc. The volume contains a first-rate collection of essays on Canada's and Quebec's experiences with immigration and diversity management. It results from a forum that was held in Barcelona that brought together an interdisciplinary group of Canadian scholars and policy practitioners to examine Canada as a case of success that could be emulated in Europe. Its aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of the Canadian model of immigration policy and diversity for both researchers and policy practitioners in Europe (and Spain in particular). In his introduction, editor Dan Rodriguez-Garcia frames the volume as a comparison of Canada with Spain, and Quebec with Catalonia. Nevertheless, with the exception of the introduction and an overview chapter on the Canadian case (chapter 1 by Jeffrey Reitz) that refers briefly to Spain, the comparison is only implicit insofar as it structures the volume's innovative organization. The remaining chapters (2-14) are divided into six sections each containing chapters on Canada and Quebec with the goal of highlighting how immigration and diversity are managed in multinational states like Spain. Thus, although the volume's subtitle suggests a transatlantic perspective, reference to Europe (mainly Spain) is only made in its introduction and very briefly in chapter 1. It invites a transatlantic dialogue rather than records one. Part 1 examines government jurisdiction in the Canadian federation. Peter Li (chapter 2) provides an overview of the (racist) history of immigration legislation and critical analysis of intergovernmental agreements in the immigration field. In chapter 3, Louise Fontaine outlines the division of responsibility in immigration between the federal government and Quebec as established by the Canada-Quebec Accord. Part II deals with the management of immigration flows. In chapter 4, Monica Boyd and Naomi Alboim provide an overview of immigration legislation, policy goals and governance systems. It includes an analysis of the recent legislative changes that enhanced the power of the Minister of Immigration in immigrant selection and processing applications. In chapter 5, Gerard Pinsonneault provides strong empirical support for the effectiveness of the Quebec government's immigrant selection policies in achieving their goal of francization of its immigrant population. Part III covers and the labour market. In chapter 6, Yves Poisson offers the only positive assessment of recent changes in selection policy and practice. He argues that employers as well as cities and communities ought to play a larger role in the process. In chapter 7, Jack Jedwab identifies income gaps between immigrants and the Canadian-born that vary by both province and city. Of particular note is the finding that the income gap between immigrants and non-immigrants is larger in Quebec than the rest of Canada. Part IV considers the themes of citizenship, settlement and socio-cultural immigration. In chapter 8, Myer Siemiatycki develops three periods of immigration in Canadian history arguing that the current era's focus is on a flexible workforce in a securitized state (2000-present) that has undermined the pillars of integration that served to make Canada a success story in immigration (245). In chapter 9, Maryse Potvin focuses on the media's role in inflaming tensions during the reasonable accommodation debate in Quebec. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle