Beyond Nation: Time, Writing, and Community in the Work of Abe Kôbô by Richard F. Calichman
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Beyond Nation: Time, Writing, and Community in the Work of Abe Kôbô by Richard F. Calichman Darcy Gauthier Calichman, Richard F. Beyond Nation: Time, Writing, and Community in the Work of Abe Kôbô. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2016. Pp. 288. $65.00. In the introduction to his 2013 translation of Abe Kôbô's essays, The Frontier Within, Richard Calichman argues that the Western reception of Japanese literature has typically worked to reinforce the borders of the Western subject through the projection of difference onto Japan as exotic Other (Abe x). However, he continues, Abe Kôbô has not fit comfortably into this essentialist imagining of the Japanese author, and is considered an anomalous writer, not typically "Japanese" since his works are less concerned with standard orientalist tropes and more with the experimental and the avant-garde. As a result, Western scholars have focused on the ways in which Abe has been "influenced" by Western literary and philosophical sources, such as Kafka, Camus, Sartre, and Marx, among others. In other words, the reception of Japanese literature in the West has worked to mutually reinforce the legitimacy of both West and East as stable geographic coordinates within the Western imagination. Though Abe has constantly worked to challenge the stability of these coordinates and their reduction of subjectivity to national belonging, he has nonetheless been interpreted within the confines of their logic, as a Japanese writer influenced by Western ideas. In Beyond Nation, Calichman builds on the insights received from Abe's critical essays translated in The Frontier Within in order to explain in more depth the ways in which Abe problematizes these assumptions concerning identity formation and [End Page 504] national affiliation. Calichman refuses to pigeonhole Abe as a "Japanese" author, and actively avoids "any Orientalist projection that would find satisfaction in uncovering a link, grounded in some spurious 'asian' identity" (113), between Abe's work and essentializing markers of Japaneseness. At the same time, he refuses to interpret Abe within a binary model of Western influence. Rather than fall into these traps, he instead presents a rigorously methodological approach to Abe's writing that works to destabilize the traditional disciplinary limitations of Japan Studies that would position and understand Abe through the logic national difference and affiliation. The central claim of Beyond Nation, as I interpret it, is that Abe's work expresses a philosophy of self-deferral, whereby all identity formations, collective and individual, necessarily produce through the very process of self-creation an excess (temporal, signifying, subjective) that resists all efforts to be appropriated. Calichman explores how this fundamental process of self-deferral is developed in Abe's writing, with each chapter focusing on a different aspect: writing, temporality and spatiality, community, and the academic institution. His focus is mostly on Abe's works of fiction and essays from the 1960s, and, without diminishing the significance of Calichman's insights, it is unfortunate that there is no treatment of the significant body of theatre that Abe produced in the decade prior, as his focus there on the fluidity of surface appearances and resistance to the discourse of interiority would have made a valuable contribution to Calichman's understanding of Abe's method. It would be equally unfortunate, however, to focus on comprehensiveness as a metric of worth. Quite the opposite: if we are to take Abe's notion of self-deferral seriously, then we ought to question whether it even makes sense for Beyond Nation to treat Abe Kôbô as a coherent subject and his writing as belonging to a singular, differentiated, and comprehensive oeuvre. Chapter One of Beyond Nation explores these issues of identity through the question of writing. Trough a reading of Abe's novel Suna no Onna (Woman in the Dunes, 1962), Calichman explores the paradox of claiming identity through signification. Niki Junpei, the protagonist of Woman in the Dunes, must identify himself by reference to his proper name, evidenced through business cards and tax documents, but the inherent repeatability of the signifier also opens his identity up to difference. By arguing that the act of writing is not self-identical-leaving a remainder, mark, or trace that when...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».