MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2902491115 · doi:10.1111/gwat.12844

Toward Large‐Scale Integrated Surface and Subsurface Modeling

2018· editorial· en· W2902491115 sur OpenAlexaff
Steven J. Berg, Edward A. Sudicky

Notice bibliographique

RevueGround Water · 2018
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHydrological modellingGroundwater rechargeScale (ratio)Computer scienceHydrogeologyGraphics processing unitHydrology (agriculture)Field (mathematics)Groundwater modelGeologyGroundwaterData scienceGeographyMathematicsAquiferCartographyClimatology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Since the original publication of Freeze and Harlan (1969), both the hydrology and hydrogeology communities have made considerable progress regarding these three questions, particularly for local- to mid-scale applications (i.e., <1000 km2). Based on the large body of literature for surface water and groundwater models at these scales and the growing body of literature for fully-integrated hydrologic models, we believe that these three questions have been satisfactorily addressed at these scales. However, policy decisions are often concerned with much larger scales (e.g., political boundaries, or large watersheds and basins) requiring fully-integrated hydrologic models at increasingly larger scales (i.e., >100,000 km2). While some progress has been made in addressing Freeze and Harlans' (1969) questions at these larger scales, this is still very much an emerging field of research. Where are we now? One of the key benefits of integrated hydrologic models is that they are conceptually simpler to setup (e.g., the upper boundary of the model is driven by precipitation, and recharge is computed internally by the model). However, current computational resources prevent numerical models with meter scale resolution across 100,000 km2. So we either have to build coarse mesh models and rely on upscaling of parameters in the governing equations to compensate for the coarse mesh or use many linked high-resolution models covering the area of interest. Both approaches have their limitations, of course. However, as fast inexpensive computing resources continue to improve (i.e., graphics processing unit (GPU) solvers, model parallelization, central processing unit (CPU) clock-speed, and hyperthreaded chips), the deployment of these large models is becoming increasingly feasible. Data acquisition has also improved with government agencies compiling large harmonized open source data sets such as, for instance, digital elevation models (DEMs), land classification, vegetation mapping, soils maps, and increasingly also hydrostratigraphy. The availability of these datasets greatly facilitates the rapid generation of models for large regions of interest. Where are we going? Given the growth of fully-integrated model applications over the past 10–15 years, we believe that the use of such models to address real-world problems will continue to grow rapidly, both for academic and commercial applications. From our experience, one of the biggest challenges for commercial deployment is the lack of students who are trained to conceptualize and model the terrestrial water cycle in a holistic sense. Educational institutions need to rethink the classical treatment of surface water and groundwater systems as separate domains, both conceptually and numerically, and start teaching these as a single integrated continuum. These students, if supplemented with strong quantitative training, including gathering of datasets from diverse sources, numerical methods, and model construction, will be the leaders in the field of fully-integrated hydrologic modeling. Given the recent technological and scientific advancements that have occurred in this field, we believe that the future of integrated modeling will witness a shift toward living (i.e., real-time) models that are continuously running, driven by short- and medium-term weather forecasts while assimilating terrestrial and space-based sensor data. Many grand challenges remain, however, which have yet to be explored in process-based integrated models. Most if not all applications have yet to address surface and subsurface water quality issues at the basin scale, such as solute fate and transport taking in account multispecies chemical reactions as relevant to lake eutrophication due to agro-nutrient inputs. This is just one example, but many more challenges exist or will be uncovered as the water, food and energy sustainability concerns posed by society in the 21st century continue to grow.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,149
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations20
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGround WaterMême sujetHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesTravaux en français237 207