Cyber dating abuse perpetration: evolving methods of adolescent relationship abuse expression through technology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The rapid progression of technology and interconnectivity has led to new forms of communication and, thus, a new form of adolescent abusive expression occurring as cyber dating abuse (CDA). With recent notoriety and research conducted on traditional adolescent relationship abuse and cyberbullying as separate public health issues, this study aimed to fill the gaps in existing literature by examining CDA perpetration among an adolescent population. Specifically, this research examined the possibility of reciprocal victimization and perpetration experienced between partners within a relationship. Models and theories found in the literature in relation to CDA perpetration were examined. Also, any differences between older and young age groups in either CDA perpetration, or risk factors for CDA perpetration appearing in the literature, were analyzed. It was hypothesized, based on previous research on traditional dating abuse, that there would be a bidirectional and reciprocal nature of CDA perpetration and victimization between partners within a relationship, that the socioecological model would appear most frequently in current literature examining CDA perpetration, and that CDA perpetration would occur more often among older adolescents as compared to younger adolescents. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases were searched resulting in a total of 17 non-duplicate, peer-reviewed cross-sectional and cohort studies analyzing CDA perpetration among adolescents with a mean age of 24-years-old between the years of 2010 and 2018. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study validity. Overall prevalences of CDA perpetration varied significantly between studies based on the different definitions, methods, and measurement scales used. CDA victimization and perpetration were found to be highly correlated when examined in most studies, although it was also found that reciprocity of CDA in relationships may occur less than reciprocity of some traditional adolescent relationship abuse forms. While gender differences were examined frequently among descriptive analyses, no single theory was found more than others in the literature investigating or explaining CDA perpetration among adolescents. Lastly, direct comparisons between older and younger age groups in terms of CDA perpetration prevalence, frequency, and risk factors have yet to be established. Results suggest the need for further research on the issue of CDA, as well as a comprehensive and validated measure for better assessment and prevention. Clinically, predicting risk factors and screening methods among the adolescent population will reduce overall prevalence and frequency of this unique and emerging public health issue.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,030 | 0,062 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,023 | 0,019 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».