Fixing the Poor: Eugenic Sterilization and Child Welfare in the Twentieth Century by Molly Ladd-Taylor
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Fixing the Poor: Eugenic Sterilization and Child Welfare in the Twentieth Century by Molly Ladd-Taylor Jon Wlasiuk Ladd-Taylor, Molly – Fixing the Poor: Eugenic Sterilization and Child Welfare in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017. Pp. 275. The state of Indiana passed the first eugenic sterilization law in 1907, and over the next eighty years thirty-two states sterilized more than 63,000 Americans often without prior consent and at times without the patient's knowledge. For historians, eugenic sterilization has become a set-piece illustrating the hubris of the high-modernist faith in medical authority with sinister echoes of the Nazi quest for racial purity. In this poignant study of the state of Minnesota's eugenic sterilization program, Molly Ladd-Taylor provides a sobering reassessment anchored to evidence that gives voice to the heartbreaking experience of the men and women who became the subjects of Minnesota's sterilization program. Ladd-Taylor argues that so much scholarly attention has focused on outliers, such as states with high-sterilization rates or zealous eugenicists, that valuable narratives about the average experience has been overlooked. Minnesota provides an ideal case study because it sterilized a modest number of people (2,350) more or less on a voluntary basis with few active partnerships between the program and the eugenics movement. As Ladd-Taylor argues, this book is a social history focused on the routine "social welfare policies that aimed to solve the problems of poverty, sex, and single motherhood by 'fixing' the poor" (p. 2). As such, Ladd-Taylor's research is part of a revision among scholars to highlight how American understandings of the connections between poverty, behavior, and reproduction have changed and persisted into the present. Eugenic sterilization was born out of the crises of the Gilded Age, when growing urban populations composed of ethnically diverse immigrants stretched social support systems to the breaking point during the boom and bust cycles that characterized the time period. Ladd-Taylor argues that two Gilded Age ideas would inform eugenic policies throughout the twentieth century. The first was the identification of a two-tiered understanding of poverty and an impulse to distinguish between the "deserving" and "undeserving" poor through "scientific charity" (p. 27). The second was the invention of childhood as a distinct and fragile stage of development necessary to producing fully realized citizens and workers. Scientific charity gained coherence in the 1870s and 1880s with the publication of Richard Dugdale's 1877 eugenic study of the Jukes family and Frederick Wine's demographic analysis of "defective" classes for the 1880 census. These two studies confidently tied poverty to genetics and attempted to quantify the economic and social costs of, in Wine's phrasing, the "morphology of evil" (p. 29). In creating its first poor law in 1864, the state of Minnesota recognized a public responsibility for addressing poverty that blossomed into a flirtation with socialism during the People's Party movement of the 1890s, which advocated systemic reform of society to uplift the deserving poor. By the Progressive Era, scientific charity had merged with eugenics to focus on the childhood environment. For Ladd-Taylor, the passage of Minnesota's Children's Code in 1917 served as "the foundation of its eugenic sterilization law" because it encoded these earlier understandings [End Page 435] into law and empowered the state to "impose certain behavioral and economic standards on the poor" (pp. 26, 56). As the Children's Code swamped Minnesota's aging institutions, Ladd-Taylor details how welfare officials viewed sterilization as a solution to poverty. Ladd-Taylor is at her best when situating Minnesota's experience in the larger context of American history, such as the Progressive Era imperative to quantify and categorize every facet of economic and social life. As Victorian social norms of female behavior clashed with the ascendant dance hall culture of the Jazz Age, the more traditional social welfare agents at the Minnesota Board of Control came into conflict with such hardcore eugenicists as Guy C. Hanna, the superintendent at the Faribault School for the Feebleminded. Ladd-Taylor reconstructs these battles by mining rich local collections. While Hanna believed that feeblemindedness was a...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».