MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2903500149 · doi:10.1071/rdv31n1ab90

90 Effects of treatment with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug Anafen prior to embryo recovery and the number of embryo flush procedures performed on prostaglandin levels in uterine fluid and pregnancy rate following embryo transfer

2018· article· en· W2903500149 sur OpenAlexaff
R. Dupras, Louis Mills, Catherine Meunier, Younès Chorfi

Notice bibliographique

RevueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Établissements canadiensCegep de Saint HyacintheUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUterine hornsUterusEmbryoEmbryo transferPregnancyMedicineAndrologyPregnancy rateBiologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Some studies have shown that performing a second flush during embryo collection can increase the number of embryos recovered. However, this technique results in greater uterine manipulation that may increase PGF2a in the uterine fluid of donor cows and affect pregnancy rate in recipient females. Two experiments were conducted (1) to determine whether PGF2a concentration in uterine fluid was affected by treatment with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) before embryo recovery and (2) to determine whether the percent of recipients becoming pregnant following embryo transfer (P/ET) was affected by flush number. In both experiments, lactating Holstein cows were used as donors (n = 18 and 34, respectively) and subjected to a standard superovulation protocol (Baracaldo et al. 2000 Theriogenology 53, 1239-1250, DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00268-5). Embryo recovery was performed using 2 catheters that were inserted simultaneously into the uterus, 1 into each horn. During the first flush, a volume of 300 mL of flush medium was used in each horn. At the end of the first flush approximately 75 mL of fluid was left and, after 1 h, a second flush was performed to recover the remaining fluid. Samples were taken from each horn at the first and second flush to determine PGF2a concentration using a bovine PGFM ELISA kit. Data for PGF2a concentrations in uterine fluid were presented as the average of both uterine horns. In Exp. 1, donors were randomly assigned to be treated with or without 1.2 g of the NSAID Anafen (ketoprofen) IM 20 min before embryo recovery. In Exp. 2, recovered grade-1 embryos from the first and second flush procedures were frozen in ethylene glycol and subsequently transferred to synchronized Holstein heifers (n = 106 and 49 for the first and second flushes, respectively). Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation at Day 60. All data were analysed using t-test. In Exp. 1, Anafen treatment 20 min before embryo recovery reduced PGF2a in uterine fluid during the second flush procedure (105.9 ± 11.4 v. 43.6 ± 5.7 pg/mL; P < 0.001), but not during the first (54.7 ± 7.3 v. 44.2 ± 5.6 pg/mL; P = 0.34). In Exp. 2, PGF2a in uterine fluid was greater for the second flush as compared to the first flush (95.9 ± 7.4 v. 56.3 ± 5.5 pg/mL; P < 0.001). A total of 345 viable embryos were recovered from the 34 donors in Exp. 2 (n = 276 and 69 for the first and second flushes, respectively). The P/ET at Day 60 was greater (P < 0.05) for recipients that received embryos from the first flush as compared to recipients that received embryos from the second flush (64.2 v. 49.0%). Taken together, the results of the present study indicate that the second flush procedure results in greater PGF2a levels in uterine fluid and that embryos recovered during the second flush are less likely to establish pregnancy following transfer. Moreover, pretreatment of donors with the NSAID Anafen reduced PGF2a levels in uterine fluid during the second flush. Further research is needed to determine whether treatment of donors with NSAID can improve the P/ET achieved following the transfer of embryos recovered following a second flush procedure.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,746
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,294

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentMême sujetReproductive Physiology in LivestockTravaux en français237 207