12 Effect of additional prostaglandin F2a during the Ovsynch protocol applied in different postpartum intervals in lactating dairy cows: Preliminary results
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Timed AI (TAI) programs have been developed to increase the service risk. However, when Ovsynch is used as a synchronization protocol, lack of regression of the corpus luteum after prostaglandin F2a (PGF) administration has been demonstrated, leading to reductions in fertility. In this way, a second PGF administration might increase the frequency of achieving complete luteolysis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an additional treatment with PGF on fertility when an Ovsynch synchronization protocol was applied at different postpartum intervals. Multiparous high-production dairy cows (n = 471) of a commercial farm were stratified by postpartum intervals [<120 (n = 136), 120-150 (n = 131), 150-180 (n = 92), 180-210 (n = 52), and >210 days (n = 60)] and randomly allocated to receive either the Ovsynch (n = 108) or Ovsynch with second PGF protocol (n = 243). Cows inseminated 12 h after observed heat detection (AI) served as a control (n = 120). The Ovsynch protocol consisted of an injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (100 µg; Fertagyl®, Intervet, Millsboro, MD, USA) on Day 0, an injection of PGF (0.5 mg; Estrumate®, Schering-Plough Animal Health, Montréal, QC, Canada) on Day 7, another injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (100 µg) on Day 9, and timed insemination on Day 10. The Ovsynch with second PGF protocol consisted of the same hormone injection schedule as the Ovsynch protocol, but a second injection of PGF (0.5 mg; Estrumate®) was administered 24 h after the first PGF. Data were analysed using the chi-square test. The level of significance was taken as P < 0.05. When data were pooled at 120 to 150 days of postpartum interval, pregnancy rate was higher, but not significantly different (P > 0.05), for cows that received the Ovsynch (37.5%, n = 32) or Ovsynch with second PGF protocol (33.8%, n = 77) compared to nonsynchronized cows (22.8%, n = 22). After 180 days of postpartum interval, Ovsynch with second PGF protocol triggered pregnancy rates similar to those of nonsynchronized cows (33.3%, n = 21 and 28.6%, n = 14), whereas the Ovsynch protocol resulted in lower percentages (11.8%, n = 17; P > 0.05). Similar pregnancy rates (P > 0.05) were observed when TAI protocols were administered before 120 days (26.5 and 30.2% for Ovsynch and Ovsynch with second PGF, respectively) or between 150 and 180 postpartum days (31.8 and 33.9% for Ovsynch and Ovsynch with second PGF, respectively) compared with AI cows (25.7 and 28.8% for <120 days and between 150 and 180 postpartum days, respectively). These preliminary results showed a tendency of a better pregnancy rate when both TAI synchronization protocols were applied between 120 and 150 postpartum days when compared with AI. Also, the application of a second dose of PGF seems recommendable when the Ovsynch protocol is used to synchronize cows of >180 postpartum days. Ongoing research will allow an increase in the number of the samples in each postpartum interval in order to confirm these results.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».