MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W290432445

Maritime Baptist Union and the Power of Regionalism

2004· article· en· W290432445 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel C. Goodwin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDominionOrthodoxyLawConventionPolitical scienceNegotiationSociologyHistoryEconomic history
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The best-known church union in Canadian history is without doubt that of United Church of Canada in 1925, when nation's Congregationalists, Methodists, and roughly two-thirds of its Presbyterians joined together. This moment was born out of a long series of studies and negotiations rooted in notion that a national or even quasi-established church could extend Christian influence much further in Canadian society than large denominations could, if their efforts remained separate. Leading up to formation of United Church of Canada were a series of mergers within Congregational, Methodist, and Presbyterian denominational families that advanced Old World notion that strong national churches would be in best position to make Canada [God's] Dominion. (1) Twenty years before actual formation of United Church of Canada, a lesser-known ecclesial union was achieved when three Maritime Baptist denominations came together in 1905 and 1906 to create United Baptist Convention of Maritime Provinces (UBCMP). The dynamics leading up to Baptist union were similar to those preceding formation of United Church but differed in some crucial ways. An examination of Maritime Baptist union in comparative perspective reveals extent to which competing visions of church union in late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Canada reflected commitments to regional, national, and international religious identities. In 1946, historian George Levy wrote The Baptists of Maritime Provinces, 1753-1946 to help his denomination celebrate its fortieth anniversary as a union of Arminian and Calvinistic Baptists. During period from 1905 to 1906 three denominations, Maritime Convention of Maritime Baptists, Free Baptists of New Brunswick, and Free Baptists of Nova Scotia, merged to create UBCMP. In chapter Consummation of Union, Levy cited often-repeated pragmatic causes for church unions in Canada, regardless of denomination, such as duplication of pastorates, shortages of ministers, and growing need for collective home and foreign mission efforts. One less tangible factor leading up to Maritime Baptist union was, according to Levy, the feeling that ... denominations ought to be one. (2) Although he attempted to suggest that Regular (Calvinist) and Free (Arminian) Baptists of region gradually became more like each other, he did not explore why. What happened in nineteenth century to soften denominational boundaries to point that these three groups were able to see themselves as possessing same identity? Although practical issues surrounding denomination-building are not in doubt, they do beg question of self-understanding. Why were Calvinistic and Arminian Baptists willing to create a new denomination and leave behind denominations they had worked so hard to build? This is question that concerns this study. It is argument of this essay that Maritime Baptist union was achieved in large measure because religious identity among these groups was forged in same nineteenth-century context. All three founding denominations had strong roots in late-eighteenth-century revivals of Maritime region and remained committed to new birth, (3) believer's baptism by immersion, and believer's church. In addition, they experienced a heightened sense of free moral agency that was spread by emergence of market capitalism and responsible government. This in turn led to modification and decline of Calvinism among Regular Baptists. Each of founding groups called upon authority of past to make case for union during a time when a particular interpretation of founders' wishes proved to be convincing. As all of these Baptists sought to increase their influence by moving toward Protestant mainstream of Maritime society, they rejected extreme expressions of their traditions and theological innovations, including Calvinistic and Arminian primitivism, belief in instantaneous sanctification, and biblical higher criticism. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,085
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,268

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,020
Communication savante0,0080,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of ecumenical studiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207