Investigating Facet Selectivity of Li Deposition on Cu Current Collector for Anode-Free Lithium Metal Batteries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Li metal is considered as one of optimal candidates for high-energy anode material because it has the highest theoretical specific capacity (3,860 mAh g -1 ) and the lowest redox potential (−3.04 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode). However, safety concerns and low coulombic efficiency issues, which are caused by the inhomogeneous Li deposition/dissolution and continuous corrosion by electrolytes during battery cycling, have prohibited the use of metallic Li as anode in practical Li metal batteries. Lithium metal batteries (LMBs), which replace graphite anode with Li metal from conventional lithium ion batteries (LIBs), are considered as the most realistic approach to increase energy density of rechargeable battery. Furthermore, an anode-free LMB which features the only use of current collector in the anode compartment is the design to maximize the energy density of LMB. Because the current collector could affect the nucleation behaviors at the initial state of Li plating and the morphological development of the subsequently plated Li, it is a key component for achieving cycling stability of anode-free LMBs. Cu current collector is the most widely adopted current collector for the anode of LIBs and LMBs due to its high conductivity, mechanical property, and electrochemical stability, but is known to have a large Li nucleation overpotential in comparison with Au or Ag. That is because the binding energies of Li atom on bulk Li is much larger than that of Li atom on bulk Cu (which are around 24~30 and 2.5~2.7 kcal mol -1 , respectively). Therefore, the surficial modulation of Cu current collector is needed to improve the affinity between Li metal and Cu and induce uniform initial Li deposition on Cu current collector. Cu collectors used for lithium ion battery, which are fabricated by electrodeposition method, have various crystalline facets on their surfaces. On the basis of the principle of nucleation and growth, the degree of crystalline misfit between adsorbent and substrate can vary depending on the surface facet of substrate. We believe that it can be a key principle for manipulating an initial Li nucleation mode on Cu substrate. In detail, we explore a facet selective Li nucleation and growth phenomenon on Cu and demonstrate that controlling the facet structure can improve the uniformity in Li deposition and the cycling stability. Preferential Li deposition on the Cu(100) plane is demonstrated by electrochemical analysis of the Cu single crystal surfaces and by EBSD analysis of the Li-deposited Cu surfaces. DFT calculations show that a difference in the Li adsorption energy during the initial Li deposition process among the Cu facets is responsible for the facet selectivity. A majorly (100) plane-orientated Cu foil fabricated with a simple annealing method has a more uniform Li nucleation with a 6-times higher nuclei density and a two-fold enhancement in the Li cycling stability compared with a conventional Cu foil with randomly oriented surface facets. The control of the surface facet provides a new design principle for the current collector of lithium metal batteries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».