MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2905016588 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-118299

Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018· review· en· W2905016588 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Dawn Maze, Sajida Kazi, Vikas Gupta, Ann Kinga Malinowski, Rouhi Fazelzad, Prakesh S. Shah, Nadine Shehata

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePregnancyEssential thrombocythemiaSystematic reviewPediatricsMyelofibrosisMeta-analysisPolycythemia veraObstetricsMEDLINEInternal medicineBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and myelofibrosis (MF) are a group of hematopoietic stem cell-derived clonal disorders collectively known as the classical, Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Although MPN diagnoses are typically made in the sixth or seventh decade of life, approximately 20% of ET patients and 15% of PV patients are under the age of 40 years. Pregnancy with an MPN is associated with maternal thrombosis, hemorrhage and placental dysfunction leading to fetal growth restriction or loss. The aims of this systematic review were to determine the risk of maternal and fetal complications in pregnancy complicated by MPN and to quantify the benefit of commonly used interventions. Methods A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE (1946 to July 2018), EMBASE (1947 to July 2018), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2005 to July 2018), CCRCT (inception to June 2018), and Epub Ahead of Print & Other Non-Indexed Citations (inception to July 2018). Bibliographic references were reviewed for additional studies. There were no date or language restrictions and the review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018090680). Studies were included if they reported on maternal or fetal outcomes of pregnancy in patients with an MPN. Case reports and series including fewer than 10 patients were excluded. Duplicate reports were excluded, with only the most recent or most informative included. Data were extracted independently by two investigators (D.M. and S.K.). The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included fetal complications (e.g. intrauterine growth restriction) and maternal complications (e.g. pre-eclampsia, thrombosis, hemorrhage). Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Analyses were performed using Open Meta-Analyst version 10.12 and Review Manager version 5.3. Results The search strategy resulted in 4191 records of which 22 met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). The studies included a total of 779 women and 1226 pregnancies. Fifteen of the studies included patients with ET, 3 included patients with PV, and 4 included patients with any classical MPN. There were no studies of MF patients that met our inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were retrospective cohort studies (19) and 3 were prospective cohort studies. Among 1226 pregnancies, the live birth rate was 70%. Of 821 pregnancies with ET and 171 with PV, the live birth rate was 71% and 51%, respectively. The live birth rate was higher in patients with ET who received low dose aspirin during pregnancy than those managed with observation alone (OR 5.0; 95% CI 2.2 - 11.3; I226%; Figure 2). There was no further improvement with the addition of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to aspirin (OR 2.8; 95% CI 0.67 - 11.7; I20%). Interferon alpha (INF) during pregnancy was also associated with a higher live birth rate (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.5 - 10.4; I22.5%; Figure 3). The presence of the JAK2 mutation resulted in a lower live birth rate (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.4 - 0.9; I26%; Figure 4). Maternal events were unaffected by the addition of aspirin (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.16 - 1.4; I20%) or INF (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.01 - 1.5; I20%). Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Most studies included a representative cohort and follow up was generally adequate to at least 6 weeks postpartum. Only 3 studies included a control group. Conclusions The preliminary results of our systematic review determined that the live birth rate is lower in pregnant patients with MPN as compared to the general population. The chance of a successful pregnancy was higher in patients with ET than PV and the presence of the JAK2 mutation increased the risk of fetal loss. Patients who received low-dose aspirin during pregnancy had a 5-fold higher odds of a successful pregnancy than those managed with usual care and observation alone. Cytoreduction with INF improved the odds of live birth by nearly 4-fold. Maternal events were uncommon overall and no intervention was found to be beneficial. Our review is limited by generally small sample sizes and the retrospective nature of most studies. Additionally, given that the studies span up to 4 decades, our results may be affected by changing standards of care. Pregnancy in patients with MPN is uncommon and this is the only systematic review to determine the chance of successful pregnancy and quantify the benefit of commonly used interventions. Disclosures Maze: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kazi:Shire: Other: Vonvendi was provided by Shire. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0130,022
Bibliométrie0,0060,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207