(November 2018 to 2014) The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between the ideas of some people (2011-2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy (this manuscript would require a REVOLUTION in academy environment!)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Some preliminary comments \n Introduction: The EDWs perspective in my article from 2005 and my book from 2008 \n \n I.\tPHYSICS, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY (âREBORN DINOSAURSâ )\n â¢\t(2016) Did Sean Carrollâs ideas (California Institute of Technology, USA) (within the wrong framework, the âuniverseâ) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2010) (within the EDWs framework) on quantum mechanics, the relationship between Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics, life, the mind-brain problem, etc.?\n â¢\t(2016) The unbelievable similarities between Frank Wilczekâs ideas (Nobel Prize in Physics) and my ideas (2002-2008, etc.) (Philosophy of Mind and Quantum Mechanics)\n â¢\t(2017) Strong similarity between Carlo Rovelliâs ideas (Italy) in two books (2015, 2017) to my ideas (2002-2008) + commentary February 2018!\n â¢\t(2016) Kastner + (2017) R. E. Kastner, Stuart Kauffman, Michael Epperson âTaking Heisenbergâs Potentia Seriouslyâ: Quite similar ideas to my ideas (2008) + \n â¢\t(2017) A trick: Unbelievable similarities between Lee Smolinâs ideas (2017) and my ideas (2002-2008) \n â¢\t(May 2018) âThus spoke Zarathustra!â - A fairy-tale with Eugen Ionesco and the Idiot about Nothingness\n \n \n II.\tPHYSICS\n â¢\t(2011) The unbelievable similarities between Radu Ionicioiu (Physics, University of Bucharest, Romania) and Daniel R. Ternoâs ideas (Physics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia) and my ideas (Quantum Mechanics)\n â¢\t(2013) Côté B. Gilbert (Oontario, Canada) Unbelievalbe similarities\n â¢\t(2015) The strong similarity between Pikovski Igor, Zych Magdalena, Costa Fabio, and Brukner Äaslavâs ideas and my ideas (2006-2008) regarding the Schrodingerâs catâs interactions with its environment (the gravitation of Earth) (both entities being macro-objects) (Quantum Mechanics)\n â¢\t(2015) The strong similarity between Elisabetta Caffauâs ideas (Center for Astronomy at the University of Heidelberg and the Paris Observatory) and my ideas (2011, 2014) regarding the appearance of Big Bang in many places (Cosmology)\n â¢\t(2015) Did Wolfram Schommers (University of Texas at Arlington, USA & Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany) plagiarize my ideas? (Physics)\n â¢\t(2015) Some astrophysicists about "Dark Matter May be 'Another Dimension' - Or Even a Major Galactic Transport System" January 22, 2015\n â¢\t(2016) The strong similarities between Dylan H. Mahler, Lee Rozema, Kent Fisher, Lydia Vermeyden, Kevin J. Resch, Howard M. Wiseman, and Aephraim Steinbergâs ideas (USA) and my ideas (Quantum Mechanics)\n â¢\t(2016) The unbelievable similarities between Bill Poirierâs âMany Interacting Worldsâ and my EDWs (Quantum Mechanics)\n â¢\t(2016 or 2017) Similarities between Adam Frankâs ideas (University of Rochester in New York , USA) (âMinding matter - The closer you look, the more the materialist position in physics appears to rest on shaky metaphysical groundâ) and my ideas (2005, 2008)\n â¢\t(2017, 2017) Did Sebastian de Haro (HPS, Cambridge, UK) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008) \n â¢\t(2017) Unbelievable similarities between Laura Condiottoâs ideas and my ideas (2002-2008)\n â¢\t(2016) The unbelievable similarities between Hugo F. Alrøe and Egon Noeâs (Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Denmark) ideas (USA) and my ideas (2002-2008) (Bohr's complementarity extended to ontology)\n â¢\t(2017) The unbelievable similar ideas between Federico Zalameaâs ideas and my ideas\n â¢\t(2018) Unbelievable similarities between Peter J. Lewisâs ideas (2018) and my ideas (2002-2008) \n â¢\t(2018) Timothy Hollowood, âClassical from Quantumâ, [arXiv:1803.04700v1 [quant-ph] 13 March 2018]\n â¢\t(2018) Mario Hubert and Davide Romano, âThe Wave-Function as a Multi-Fieldâ\n \n III.\tCOGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY OF MIND\n â¢\t(2011-2014) Did Georg Northoff (Psychoanalysis, Institute of Mental Health) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008)?\n â¢\t(2011) The unbelievable similarities between Kalina Diego Cosmelli, Legrand Dorothée and Thompson Evanâs ideas (USA) and my ideas (Cognitive Neuroscience)\n â¢\t(2015) Did David Ludwig (Philosophy, University of Amsterdam) plagiarize many of my ideas? (Philosophy (of Mind)\n â¢\t(2016) Did Neil D. Theise (Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA) and Kafatos C. Menas (Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA) plagiarize my ideas of Physics and Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy (the mind-brain problem, quantum mechanics, etc.) from 2002-2008? \n â¢\tDid David Bourget (2018) (Director, Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University (or University of Western Ontario) plagiarize my ideas regarding the mind-brain problem? + Chalmers\n â¢\t(2016) Unbelievable similarities between Dan Siegelâs ideas (Mindsight Institute, USA) and my ideas (2002-2008)\n \n IV.\tPhilosophy (of science)\n â¢\t(2010) The unbelievable similarities between Alexey Alyushin (Moscow, Russia) and my ideas (on Ontology)\n â¢\t(2013 + 2017) Did Markus Gabriel (Bonn University) plagiarize my ideas?\n â¢\t(2013) The unbelievable similarities between Andrew Newmanâs ideas (University of Nebraska, at Omaha, USA) and my ideas (Ontology)\n â¢\t(2016) Did Tahko E. Tuomas (University of Helsinki, Finland) plagiarize my ideas? + Tahko E. Tuomas (âThe Epistemology of Essenceâ) \n â¢\t(2017) Did Jani Hakkarainen (University of Tampere, Finland) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008)? + (2017) Markku Keinänen, Antti Keskinen & Jani Hakkarainen\n â¢\t(2017) The unbelievable similarities between Dean Ricklesâs ideas (HPS, Univ. of Sydney) and my ideas (2002-2008)\n â¢\t(2017) Did Dirk K. F. Meijer and Hans J. H. Geesink (University of Groningen, Netherlands) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008)? (2017) \n â¢\t(2018) Unbelievable similar ideas between Jason Winningâs ideas (2018) and my ideas (2002-2008)\n â¢\t(2018) David Mark Kovacs (Lecturer of philosophy at Tel Aviv University), âThe Deflationary Theory of Ontological Dependenceâ, Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)\n \n July 2018\n \n â¢\tOreste M. Fiocco \n â¢\tBaptiste Le Bihan (University of Geneva, forthcoming) \n â¢\tAntonella Mallozzi (The Graduate Center â CUNY, forthcoming in Synthese, penultimate draft) \n â¢\tErik C. Banks (Wright State University, 2014) \n â¢\tSami Pihlström (2009)\n â¢\tKatherin Koslickiâs ideas (2008) The Structure of Objects, Oxford University Press) and my ideas (2002-2005-2006)\n \n November 2018\n â¢\tMaurizio Ferraris (2014/2012) Manifesto of New Realism\n \n â¢\tGraham Harman (2017) : Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (Penguin Books)\n \n \n \n Conclusion [Obviously, there are other âspecialistsâ that published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas but I have not discovered them yetâ¦]\n Bibliography\n [Some people haven't read my works but they claim my ideas can be found in other works. Soon, they will discover EDWs in Shakespeare, Bach, Sophocles and ET's letter sent 10 million years ago... me vs. people who have plagiarized my ideas: on Youtube] \n [Obviously, there are other âspecialistsâ that published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas but I have not discovered them yetâ¦]\n THE REVOLUTION: PLEASE share this document with your colleagues and friends. \n If you want to change this ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT, share this manuscript! PARTICIPATE TO THE REVOLUTION!!! If you are content with your academic environment, continue to sleepâ¦\n
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».