MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2905823399 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-113858

Observational Study of Real-World Factor Utilization and Health Outcomes in Patients with Hemophilia in Canada

2018· article· en· W2905823399 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Haowei Sun, Ming Yang, Man‐Chiu Poon, Adrienne Lee, Katherine Robinson, Michelle Sholzberg, John K. Wu, Alfonso Iorio, Victor S. Blanchette, Robert J. Klaassen, Shannon Jackson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityBC Children's HospitalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenCanadian Hemophilia SocietySt. Michael's HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineObservational studyQuality of life (healthcare)RegimenHaemophiliaMedical prescriptionFamily medicinePediatricsInternal medicinePharmacology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Recombinant Factors VIII Fc (rFVIIIFc) and IX Fc (rFIXFc) fusion proteins are extended half-life (EHL) factor products approved in Canada in 2014 and became available through the Canadian Blood Services in January 2016. Real-world product utilization and clinician practice patterns in EHL prescription are unknown. Objectives: This is a prospective Canadian multi-centre observational study to describe product utilization, clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients pre- and post-switch to rFVIIIFc/ rFIXFc products compared to those who remained on standard half-life (SHL) products. The primary outcome is intra-individual change in annualized factor consumption from 12-month period pre-switch to 24-month post-switch to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. This analysis describes the baseline clinical characteristics and intra-individual changes in PROs from the cohort who completed baseline, 3-month and 12-month assessment before June 2018 in this ongoing study. Methods: Males aged ≥12 years with moderate and severe hemophilia A and B (factor level <5%) with no active inhibitors across 10 Canadian sites were enrolled; whether they were treated with prophylaxis or on-demand. Factor utilization, bleeding events, treatment regimen, and PROs were collected at baseline, 3-month, 1-year and 2-years. PRO tools evaluated in this analysis include hemophilia specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) measured with the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) in adults and the Canadian Hemophilia Outcomes-Kid's Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT) in adolescents. Haem-A-QoL scales range from 0-100, with lower scores reflecting better HRQoL, whereas higher scores in CHO-KLAT reflect better HRQoL. Treatment satisfaction was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), and chronic pain was measured using numeric rating scale from 0-10 (visual analog scale in adolescents). Results: Forty-one patients were included in this interim analysis, 29 with hemophilia A (on-demand n=4) and 12 with hemophilia B (on-demand n=2). Median age was 30 years (range 13-67). Six patients (15%) had target joints within 6 months prior to enrollment. Twenty patients remained on SHL products, 13 were switched to rFVIIIFc (2 from on-demand to once weekly prophylaxis) and 8 to rFIXFc. Common dosing regimens were: rFVIIIFc 50-65 units/kg once weekly (n=6), 20-40 units/kg twice weekly or every 3 days (n=5), and rFIXFc 40-60 units/kg once weekly (n=5). Patients who switched to Fc products tended to be older, have more severe hemophilic arthropathy, higher intensity of chronic pain related to hemophilia, and worse HRQoL than those who remained on SHL products (Table 1). The most common reasons for switching to EHL were: less infusions/ convenience (n=10), patient preference (n=9), quality of life (n=8), difficulty adhering to prophylaxis with SHL (n=7). The most common reasons for staying on SHL were: doing well on current regimen (n=18), not meeting criteria for EHL (n=8), familiarity with SHL (n=6). The rationale for EHL dose/dosing frequency is largely driven by "fixed regimen to promote adherence" (n=11) and "longer interval for convenience" (n=6), only 6 patients were dosed "for a higher trough than previous regimen". Among rFVIII to rFVIIIFc switchers and rFIX to rFIXFc switchers, there were no significant changes in the total Haem-A-QoL scores from baseline to 3-month and from baseline to 12-month (paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Table 2). The median paired differences in the Haem-A-QoL total score did not meet the clinically meaningful difference threshold in any groups. Similarly, there were no significant intra-individual changes in the CHO-KLAT score, chronic pain intensity, and TSQM-9 score from baseline to 3-month and 12-month after switch. Conclusion: We found that a cohort of Canadian patients with moderate-severe hemophilia appear to be switched to rFVIIIFc/ rFIXFc on the basis of patient convenience, expected improvement in HRQoL, and prophylaxis adherence. Although limited by a small sample size, there appears to be no significant within-individual changes in hemophilia specific HRQoL, chronic pain, and treatment satisfaction. Data collection is ongoing (expected completion date September 2019) to provide additional insight on various clinical and patient reported outcomes in the larger study population. Disclosures Sun: Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Octapharma: Research Funding. Poon:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy; Baxalta/ Shire: Consultancy. Lee:Bayer: Other: Project based funding from Bayer Hemophilia Awards Program; Bioverativ: Research Funding. Robinson:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Wu:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Octapharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board. Iorio:CSL: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with CSL; Bayer: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Bayer; Grifols: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Grifols; Pfizer: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Pfizer; Roche: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Roche; Octapharma: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Octapharma; NovoNordisk: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Novo Nordisk; Shire: Other: Alfonso Iorio's Institution has received project based funding via research or service agreements with Shire. Blanchette:Bioverativ: Other: Investigator-initiated research funding; Bayer: Other: speaker's fees; Novo Nordisk: Other: Speaker's fees; Pfizer: Other: Speaker's fees; Shire: Other: Speaker's fees; Shire: Other: Investigator-initiated research funding. Klaassen:Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cangene: Research Funding. Jackson:Bayer: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Other: Investigator initiated grant funding; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,038
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,106

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,128
Tête enseignante GPT0,361
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemophilia Treatment and ResearchTravaux en français237 207