Exploring Maternal Personal and Interpersonal Functioning to Explain the Relation between Maternal Childhood Maltreatment History and Child Behaviour Problems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I investigated the association between maternal childhood maltreatment history and child behaviour problems in the next generation, and what maternal personal and interpersonal variables mediate this relation. I hypothesized that previously studied maternal variables (maternal depression, social support, and parenting) which have largely been tested in high-risk samples, would emerge as significant mediators in this study's low-risk sample. The inclusion of two untested but theoretically important maternal constructs (adult attachment and parenting stress) were also examined. Examining these five maternal constructs in the same study using simple and parallel mediator models allowed for the opportunity to identify the unique variance contributed by these mediators.\nNinety-six mother-child dyads were assessed at two time points. When children were 16 months, mothers were given measures to assess childhood maltreatment history, adult attachment, depressive symptoms, parenting stress, and social support. Mothers were also observed with their children to assess maternal sensitivity. When children were 5-years old, an observational measure of compliance was completed and maternal reports of child behaviour were collected. Simple and parallel mediation models were constructed.\nResults included a positive association between maternal childhood trauma and mother-reported child behaviour problems. Observed child compliance was excluded from the main analyses, as it was not significantly related to maternal study variables. In regards to child internalizing behaviour problems, maternal depressive symptoms and parenting stress emerged as significant mediators when assessed separately. When both simple mediators were examined in parallel, maternal depressive symptoms was the only significant mediator. Maternal sensitivity was found to have a significant suppressor effect. In regards to mother-reported child externalizing behaviour problems, adult avoidant attachment, maternal depressive symptoms, parenting stress, and social support, were all significant simple mediators when assessed individually. When these four mediators were examined in parallel, parenting stress emerged as the only significant mediator. These findings provide additional evidence that childhood trauma has far-reaching impact on functioning into adulthood and that adult personal and interpersonal dysfunction impact child behaviour in the next generation. Further, depending on the child outcome (i.e., internalizing or externalizing behaviour), different mediators explain unique variance in the relation between maternal childhood maltreatment history and child behaviour problems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».