MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2906589476 · doi:10.1353/asa.2018.0036

Editors' Forum: Climate Change, Apocalypse, and the Arts of the Present

2018· article· en· W2906589476 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica Hurley, Dan Sinykin

Notice bibliographique

RevueASAP/journal · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueClimate Change Communication and Perception
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClimate changeThe artsTemporalityPraxisAestheticsPoliticsHistoryEnvironmental ethicsVisual artsSociologyArtPolitical scienceEpistemologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editors' Forum:Climate Change, Apocalypse, and the Arts of the Present Jessica Hurley and Dan Sinykin Q: Climate change is an ongoing catastrophe, but its diffuse temporal and spatial locations make it one of the hardest to fit into traditionally apocalyptic models of a single event followed by a regenerative aftermath. For this editors' forum, we asked artists and scholars to address the following questions: what is the role of art in relation to climate change? How does apocalypse function differently for differently disenfranchised groups in the age of global warming? What might apocalyptic form do for the aesthetics and politics of climate change now? In what ways might the arts address the temporality of risk associated with climate change today? The artists and scholars who contributed to this forum consider how theory and praxis change in response to the apocalyptic pressures of climate change. What collaborations form in the face of a catastrophe that is at once impending and ongoing? How do artists living in the wake of colonialism's repeated apocalypses draw upon the past to engage and resist present dangers? In a world where science and culture can feel increasingly speculative, what is the relationship between data and art? How does art hold, guide, and sometimes teach us to be at the end of the world? [End Page 479] Flying with Operation Icebridge Zaria Forman (bio) I consider it my life's mission to convey the urgency of climate change through drawing. My drawings focus on remote landscapes in flux, places that most people don't have the opportunity to experience. I was stunned and thrilled when NASA invited me to join their Operation IceBridge, which for the last decade has been mapping the geometry of the ice at both Poles. I joined them on flights over Antarctica in the Fall of 2016, and then again over Greenland and parts of Arctic Canada in the Spring of 2017. We traveled on 12-hour flights, skimming just 1500 feet above glaciers, sea ice, and mountaintops. During these flights, I witnessed the ice from an entirely new perspective, and in most cases, one that no artist had ever seen before. I gained an enormous appreciation for the complexities and dangers of the mission, and for the expertise of the flight crew and scientists. Returning from these flights, I knew I had to translate these experiences and unique perspectives into drawings. This was an opportunity to bridge disciplines and render the important work of these scientists into a more accessible medium, to communicate the data and what it means for our planet. Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. Zaria Forman, DeVicq Glacier, Antarctica, 74° 47' 58.401?S 131° 0' 54.8208″W, October 28th, 2016. 60 × 90 inches, soft pastel on paper, 2018. Image courtesy of the artist Zaria Forman. [End Page 480] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 2. Zaria Forman, Jakobshavn Glacier, Greenland, 69° 47' 31.092?N 49° 47' 31.7076″W, April 29th, 2017. 68 × 102 inches, soft pastel on paper, 2018. Image courtesy of the artist Zaria Forman. Through my drawings, I seek to change minds and call attention to important issues by simply asking people to look. Soft pastel on paper is the medium I have chosen as it best conveys the message behind my work. The process is simple and straightforward and my hands are my tools. The tactility allows me to communicate how the landscapes make me feel. When viewing my pieces, people are compelled to move closer to look at the details, especially when they realize they're not photographs. The movement creates an intimate connection that may not have happened had they simply kept their distance. This helps to immerse viewers in the details of these beautiful places so they can experience them both personally and emotionally. Much of our decision-making is guided by our emotions, and art has the special ability to tap into our emotions. It is in this spirit that I choose to convey the beauty as opposed to the devastation; if people can experience the sublimity of these landscapes, perhaps they will be inspired to protect and preserve them...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,080
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,268

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,027
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,004
Communication savante0,0150,010
Science ouverte0,0030,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0800,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,272
Tête enseignante GPT0,431
Écart entre enseignants0,159 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueASAP/journalMême sujetClimate Change Communication and PerceptionTravaux en français237 207