MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2907679006 · doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-snis.2

O-002 Lifetime benefit and cost consequences of the achieved grade of reperfusion after thrombectomy for stroke based on hermes collaboration data

2018· article· en· W2907679006 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Wolfgang G. Kunz, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Bijoy K. Menon, Jeffrey L. Saver, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Charles B.L.M. Majoie, David S. Liebeskind, Tudor G. Jovin, Antoni Dávalos, Serge Bracard, Françis Guillemin, Bruce Campbell, Peter Mitchell, Phil White, Keith W. Muir, Scott Brown, Andrew M. Demchuk, Michael D. Hill, Mayank Goyal

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)Quality-adjusted life yearWaiting listHealth careEconomic evaluationCost–benefit analysisEmergency medicineCost effectivenessMyocardial infarctionSurgeryCardiologyTransplantation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Purpose The benefit that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) offers to stroke patients with large vessel occlusions depends strongly on reperfusion grade as defined by the eTICI (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) scale. Our aim was to determine the lifetime quality of life and cost consequences of reperfusion for patients, healthcare systems, and society. Materials and methods A Markov model estimated lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALY) of EVT-treated patients and associated costs based on eTICI grades. The analysis was performed from a United States perspective with two cost frameworks: 1) healthcare costs and 2) societal costs, which include productivity losses and costs of informal care given by family members. Input parameters were based on best available evidence, including patient data from the 7-trial HERMES collaboration (ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, MR CLEAN, REVASCAT, SWIFT PRIME, PISTE, THRACE). The lead analysis was conducted for stroke onset at 65 years. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using Monte Carlo simulations. Results Lifetime QALYs increased for every grade of improved reperfusion (figure 1A). On average, eTICI 3 resulted in 6.50 QALYs over the patients‘ lifetimes, eTICI 2 c (90%–99%) in 5.89 QALYs, eTICI 2b (67%–89%) in 5.79 QALYs, eTICI 2b (50%–66%) in 4.80 QALYs, eTICI 2a in 3.55 QALYs, and eTICI 1 or 0 in 2.57 QALYs. In contrast, the healthcare and societal costs of each QALY yielded by EVT decreased for every grade of improved reperfusion (Figure 1B). The advantage of achieving eTICI 3 over eTICI 2b (50%–66%) reperfusion results in average cost-savings of about $15,000/QALY per patient incurred by the healthcare system and $20,000/QALY per patient incurred by the society. Conclusion Every grade of improved reperfusion grants stroke patients additional QALYs and substantially reduces healthcare and societal costs per QALY. The clinical benefit and cost-savings of eTICI 3 reperfusion support to assess procedural strategies aiming at complete reperfusion for safety and feasibility, even when initial reperfusion seems to be adequate (eTICI 2b). Disclosures W. Kunz: 1; C; The HERMES collaboration was supported by Medtronic through an unrestricted research grant to the University of Calgary. M. Almekhlafi: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. B. Menon:1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. J. Saver: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. D. Dippel: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. C. Majoie: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. D. Liebeskind: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. T. Jovin: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. A. Davalos: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. S. Bracard: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. F. Guillemin: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. B. Campbell: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. P. Mitchell: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. P. White: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. K. Muir: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. S. Brown: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. A. Demchuk: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. M. Hill: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. M. Goyal: 1; C; The HERMES pooled analysis project is supported by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,087

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,031
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,005
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→Travaux en français237 207→