The Unknown Kerouac: Rare, Unpublished and Newly Translated Writings by Jack Kerouac, and: La vie est d’hommage by Jack Kerouac
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Unknown Kerouac: Rare, Unpublished and Newly Translated Writings by Jack Kerouac, and: La vie est d’hommage by Jack Kerouac Katharine Streip Jack Kerouac. The Unknown Kerouac: Rare, Unpublished and Newly Translated Writings. Todd Tietchen, ed. Jean-Christophe Cloutier, trans. New York: Library of America, 2016. $31.50. Jack Kerouac. La vie est d’hommage. Jean-Christophe Cloutier, ed. and trans. Montreal: Les Éditions du Boréal, 2016. $29.95. In Jack Kerouac’s Maggie Cassidy, the narrator’s father speaks “loud, in French, like an uncle calling the idiot from the corner making clear to me meanings that can never be recorded in the English language” (Kerouac 2009: 97). Two invaluable collections of previously unpublished works by Kerouac, La vie est d’hommage and The Unknown Kerouac, reveal the profound effort and revolutionary achievement of Jack Kerouac to express those meanings. These collections show us Kerouoac’s evolution as a writer, bring to light the source of his literary experimentation as a movement between two languages, and illuminate the consequences for his thematics of travel and migration. Kerouac’s outsider perspective allowed him to create a style we now recognize as quintessentially American. These two volumes will help readers to appreciate the impact of Kerouac’s native French on his innovations in writing and give us a richer picture of his aesthetic and compositional philosophy. The Unknown Kerouac’s editor, Todd Tietchen, explains in his introduction how his volume corrects mistakes that still haunt readings of Kerouac—that he was a careless writer with a shallow knowledge of literature, more a cult figure than a dedicated and committed artist—through these significant additions to the Kerouac canon. For example, his “Journal of 1951” is a stunning record of a psychic and aesthetic breakthrough that leads to a new sense of Kerouac’s creative mission, and his resolution to create a literature of lived experience. Kerouac wrote this journal as he convalesced in a VA hospital after an attack of thrombophlebitis, “where I had time to think at last without interruption and unfolded my secret desire in writing at last:—to tell exactly what happened and not worry about style but only worry about completeness of detail and the hell with what anybody thinks,” as he explained in a 1963 interview with John Clellon Holmes (312). “Journal of 1951” highlights the diversity of inspiration for Kerouac’s literary art (Chaucer, Joyce, Dostoevsky, Melville, Proust, and Céline) and provides valuable context for Kerouac’s road novels. Migratory experience, literary archetypes of pilgrimage and quest, the aspirations of the post-war generation, and the history of the French-Canadian diaspora, all play an important role in this journal. In a haunting fragment from “Memory Babe,” an unfinished project started by Kerouac after On the Road that provides a portrait of French-Canadian life in the 1920’s and 1930’s and was meant to be included in Kerouac’s monumental The Duluoz Legend, the author notes, “American writers who write and speak only one language are lucky. I write in English but I speak French to my family. My French family on my mother’s side arrived in Quebec Canada a few miles north of Maine a long time ago. My father’s side 1756. So don’t say we’re not North Americans. What I have to do here is transpose the French talk into understandable modern American English, and then add the exact sound-spelling of the old French behind it. Besides, I want the reader to see what I had to go through and what fun it was to know 2 languages” (254). In his translator’s note, Cloutier explains how the first draft actually reads “I want the reader to see what I had to go through and how much work it is to know two languages” (xxxvi) and insightfully points out how “Kerouac revises the sentiment to make it more upbeat. This elision is pure Kerouac: the surface of pleasure shown to the public belies the tremendous toil and craft undertaken behind closed doors” (xxvi). Cloutier’s remarkable collection of previously unknown works by Kerouac in French, discovered in 2006 when the Kerouac...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».