MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2908799244 · doi:10.4095/215068

The Horseshoe Canyon Formation in southern Alberta: surface and subsurface stratigraphic architecture, sedimentology, and resource potential

2004· report· en· W2908799244 sur OpenAlexaffabout
A P Hamblin

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological formations and processes
Établissements canadiensNatural Resources Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCanyonSedimentologyGeologyHorseshoe (symbol)ArchitectureResource (disambiguation)GeomorphologyPaleontologyArchaeologyGeographyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Upper Campanian-Maastrichtian strata of the Horseshoe Canyon Formation have received little modern stratigraphic analysis on a regional scale, even though they are well exposed in the famous "Drumheller Badlands" along the Red Deer River, are present in thousands of drillholes in southern Alberta, and are endowed with significant coal and gas resources. Hence there is no regionally applicable subdivision, subsurface mapping, or appreciation of reservoir geometries and exploration strategies. Regional stratigraphic analysis of integrated surface and subsurface data from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation of south-central Alberta indicates the unit represents a third-order, southeastward-thinning, progradational system that advanced hundreds of kilometres into the Bearpaw marine basin over about 6 to 7 million years of Late Cretaceous time. The upper boundary of the Horseshoe Canyon Formation is herein formally revised to coincide with the regional unconformity present between strata of the Whitemud sandstone and the dark shale of the Battle Formation. The former "Whitemud Formation" is therefore downgraded to an informal pedogenic unit beneath this surface. In addition, the unit is clearly subdivisible into five previously unrecognized, regionally mappable informal lithostratigraphic tongues. In this study area, these comprise stacked composite, primarily regressive units that extend toward the southeast and are separated by tongues of marine shale extending toward the northwest from the main body of coeval Bearpaw Formation shale. In ascending order, these new informal tongues are here referred to as Strathmore, Hoodoo, Midland, Tolman, and Carbon, and are characterized by thinly interbedded sandstone, siltstone, coal, and various types of paleosol horizons. The tongues identified here may eventually warrant formal member status but at present, the definitions of their boundaries are inadequate for formalization. Paleoflow indicators suggest the direction of general sediment dispersal was toward the east-southeast, but that over time, dispersal tended more toward the east. Differences in paleosol type and abundance, and in coal thickness and abundance, suggest a climatic trend of most humid in the Strathmore to most arid in the Tolman, then back to humid again in the Carbon. The five Horseshoe Canyon nonmarine tongues, and the Bearpaw marine tongues that separate them, form a stacked set of asymmetrical, shallowing-upward, fourth-order regressive cycles with regional extents. In ascending order, these cycles are A) lower Bearpaw-Strathmore tongues, B) middle Bearpaw-Hoodoo tongues, C) upper Bearpaw-Midland tongues, D) Drumheller marine-Tolman tongues, and E) Carbon tongue. The locus of shoreline-related sandy deposition and the penetration of marine influence shifted southeastward (basinward) through time, denoting an overall regressive trend. The lowest Bearpaw marine tongue includes the maximum transgression phase immediately overlying the Belly River Group, whereas the subaerial unconformity at the top of the Carbon tongue represents the maximum regression surface. This unconformable top of the Horseshoe Canyon Formation is marked by the distinctive Whitemud sandstone, here interpreted as an intensely altered spodosol horizon, and is overlain by the black mudstone of the Battle Formation. Both the third-order transgressive-regressive sequence of the Dinosaur Park-Bearpaw-Horseshoe Canyon formations, and the contained fourth-order regressive cycles, are the result of fundamental regional tectonic controls on subsidence and sediment supply. In addition, nested within each fourth-order cycle is a series of thinner, asymmetrical, coarsening-upward, fifth-order, regressive subunits that mimic the thinning and fining trends of the larger cycles. These units include separate mappable reservoir or aquifer trends of channel, estuarine and shoreface character, and several of them have been studied in detail by other authors at the famous Hoodoos-Willow Creek location. The Horseshoe Canyon Formation contains potential for significant and under-exploited shallow gas, coalbed methane, and groundwater resources. More focussed exploration efforts resulting from the conclusions of this study may increase the economic benefits derived from these strata.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,396
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,894

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations35
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetGeological formations and processesTravaux en français237 207